From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"stern@rowland.harvard.edu" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"david-b@pacbell.net" <david-b@pacbell.net>,
"dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net"
<dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] ACPI GPE based wakeup event detection
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:12:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810221412.19156.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081022065101.GE15271@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
On Wednesday, 22 of October 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:39:47AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 11 of September 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > In ACPI platform, if native PME isn't enabled, GPE is used to report wakeup event.
> >
> > Add more details here, please.
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 9 ++++++
> > > drivers/acpi/bus.c | 15 +++++++++++
> > > drivers/acpi/sleep/wakeup.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 4 ++
> > > 4 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > Index: linux/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/Kconfig 2008-09-11 10:56:25.000000000 +0800
> > > +++ linux/drivers/acpi/Kconfig 2008-09-11 10:56:47.000000000 +0800
> > > @@ -45,6 +45,15 @@ config ACPI_SLEEP
> > > depends on PM_SLEEP
> > > default y
> > >
> > > +config ACPI_GPE_WAKEUP
> >
> > I'd call it ACPI_RUNTIME_WAKEUP
> ok
>
> > > +void unregister_acpi_bus_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> > > +{
> > > + blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&acpi_bus_notify_list, nb);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_acpi_bus_notifier);
> > > +
> >
> > We were talking about removing the notifier last time. Please do that.
> Did you see my comments on the issue last time? ACPI test tree already introduces
> the mechanism for other purpose, and we can just use it.
>
> > > --- linux.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h 2008-09-11 10:56:25.000000000 +0800
> > > +++ linux/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h 2008-09-11 10:56:47.000000000 +0800
> > > @@ -327,6 +327,10 @@ int acpi_bus_get_private_data(acpi_handl
> > > extern int acpi_notifier_call_chain(struct acpi_device *, u32, u32);
> > > extern int register_acpi_notifier(struct notifier_block *);
> > > extern int unregister_acpi_notifier(struct notifier_block *);
> > > +
> > > +extern int register_acpi_bus_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> > > +extern void unregister_acpi_bus_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * External Functions
> > > */
> > >
> >
> > I understand from the above that devices having their own wake-up GPEs will be
> > handled. However, it still is completely unclear to me what happens with
> > devices that can generate PME# and for which there are no specific GPEs, like
> > any devices on add-in cards.
> As we discussed last time, pci bus for add-in cards will invoke a gpe, and
> this new implementation will check all pci devices under a bridge to try to find
> a device generating PME. This should work for add-in cards.
Well, can you please describe this mechanism to me or point me to
documents/code where I can read about it?
The question is how we can learn which GPE will be used for signalling the PME#
events.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-22 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-11 6:30 [RFC 0/5] device wakeup event support v2 Shaohua Li
2008-09-11 6:30 ` [RFC 1/5] devcore introduce wakeup_event callback Shaohua Li
2008-10-19 19:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-19 19:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-19 19:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-22 5:23 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-22 5:23 ` Shaohua Li
2008-09-11 6:30 ` Shaohua Li
2008-09-11 6:30 ` [RFC 2/5] devcore adds generic wakeup event handler Shaohua Li
2008-09-11 18:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-09-11 18:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-10-19 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-22 5:24 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-22 11:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-22 11:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-22 5:24 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-19 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-11 6:30 ` Shaohua Li
2008-09-11 6:30 ` [RFC 3/5] pci wakeup handler Shaohua Li
2008-09-11 6:30 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-19 19:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-22 5:34 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-22 5:34 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-22 12:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-22 12:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-11 6:30 ` [RFC 4/5] PCIe native PME detection Shaohua Li
2008-09-11 6:30 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-19 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-22 5:49 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-22 5:49 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-22 12:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-22 12:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-11 6:30 ` [RFC 5/5] ACPI GPE based wakeup event detection Shaohua Li
2008-09-11 6:30 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-19 20:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-22 6:51 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-22 6:51 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-22 12:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-10-22 12:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-14 23:50 ` [RFC 0/5] device wakeup event support v2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-06 1:57 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-06 1:57 ` Shaohua Li
2008-09-14 23:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-08 9:19 [RFC 0/5] device wakeup event support shaohua.li
2008-09-08 9:19 ` [RFC 5/5] ACPI GPE based wakeup event detection shaohua.li
2008-09-08 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-09 1:13 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-09 1:08 ` Li, Shaohua
2008-09-09 1:08 ` Li, Shaohua
2008-09-09 11:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-09 11:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-09 14:08 ` Alan Stern
2008-09-09 14:08 ` Alan Stern
2008-09-09 1:13 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-08 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-08 9:19 ` shaohua.li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810221412.19156.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.