From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul P Komkoff Jr Subject: Re: BTRFS Performance page Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:25:28 +0400 Message-ID: <20081022192528.GB19187@stingr.net> References: <48FE5593.2080209@austin.ibm.com> <48FF4028.5080109@austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Steven Pratt Return-path: In-Reply-To: <48FF4028.5080109@austin.ibm.com> List-ID: Replying to Steven Pratt: > Steven Pratt wrote: > RAID data is now uploaded. The config used is 136 15k rpm fiber disks > in 8 arrays all striped together with DM. These results are not as > favorable to BTRFS, as there seem to be some major issues with random > write and mail server workloads. Why don't use btrfs' own RAID capabilities instead? Honestly, I will never ever use md as soon as I'll get btrfs working :) > http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/Initial-compare/Initial-Compare-RAID0.html -- Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff Jr // http://stingr.net/key <- my pgp key This message represents the official view of the voices in my head