From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Change error handling in _get_posix_acl and it's callers
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:12:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081022201245.GA5572@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081022181753.GC2495@fieldses.org>
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:17:53PM -0400, bfields wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:48:48PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> > From: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
> >
> > Change _get_posix_acl to return NULL on buflen == 0, and change users of
> > this function to handle error cases.
>
> OK, the code's certainly simpler. Makes sense. Applied to for-2.6.29.
Whoops! Sorry, spoke to soon--dropped. This breaks some ACL-related
newpynfs tests:
http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/pynfs/
The assumption that nfsd_getxattr leaves *buf untouched is probably
wrong. At the least, there's a race here--something could change
between the two calls to vfs_getxattr(), though that's not the case I'm
seeing. The filesystem may just be giving a high estimate for the
buflen in the first call.
--b.
> > {
> > void *buf = NULL;
> > - struct posix_acl *pacl = NULL;
> > + struct posix_acl *pacl;
> > int buflen;
> >
> > buflen = nfsd_getxattr(dentry, key, &buf);
> > - if (!buflen)
> > - buflen = -ENODATA;
> > - if (buflen <= 0)
> > + if (buflen < 0)
> > return ERR_PTR(buflen);
> >
> > pacl = posix_acl_from_xattr(buf, buflen);
> > @@ -526,7 +524,7 @@ nfsd4_get_nfs4_acl(struct svc_rqst *rqst
> > unsigned int flags = 0;
> >
> > pacl = _get_posix_acl(dentry, POSIX_ACL_XATTR_ACCESS);
> > - if (IS_ERR(pacl) && PTR_ERR(pacl) == -ENODATA)
> > + if (!pacl)
> > pacl = posix_acl_from_mode(inode->i_mode, GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (IS_ERR(pacl)) {
> > error = PTR_ERR(pacl);
> > @@ -536,9 +534,7 @@ nfsd4_get_nfs4_acl(struct svc_rqst *rqst
> >
> > if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
> > dpacl = _get_posix_acl(dentry, POSIX_ACL_XATTR_DEFAULT);
> > - if (IS_ERR(dpacl) && PTR_ERR(dpacl) == -ENODATA)
> > - dpacl = NULL;
> > - else if (IS_ERR(dpacl)) {
> > + if (IS_ERR(dpacl)) {
> > error = PTR_ERR(dpacl);
> > dpacl = NULL;
> > goto out;
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-22 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-22 9:18 [PATCH] nfsd: Fix memory leak in nfsd_getxattr Krishna Kumar
[not found] ` <20081022091836.22100.57827.sendpatchset-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-22 9:18 ` [PATCH] nfsd: Change error handling in _get_posix_acl and it's callers Krishna Kumar
[not found] ` <20081022091848.22100.80769.sendpatchset-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-22 18:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-10-22 20:12 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2008-10-22 18:11 ` [PATCH] nfsd: Fix memory leak in nfsd_getxattr J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081022201245.GA5572@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.