From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: ausearch on aggregation - syscall difference
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:16:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810241316.21804.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1224868121.9388.8.camel@homeserver>
On Friday 24 October 2008 13:08:41 LC Bruzenak wrote:
> Note that the syscall is listed differently.
Interesting.
> This is using the 1.7.7 code (on F9), I have not yet moved over to 1.7.8
> in case it may be fixed there.
Nope...nothing was changed there to fix it. This is the first I'd heard of the
problem..Can you show me the raw record?
ausearch -ts today -a 10038 --raw
Thanks,
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-24 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-24 17:08 ausearch on aggregation - syscall difference LC Bruzenak
2008-10-24 17:16 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2008-10-24 17:27 ` LC Bruzenak
2008-10-24 18:37 ` Steve Grubb
2008-10-24 17:30 ` LC Bruzenak
2008-10-24 18:28 ` John Dennis
2008-10-24 18:38 ` LC Bruzenak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810241316.21804.sgrubb@redhat.com \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.