From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: Current suspend issues on Lenovo X200 (w/ Intel graphics) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:05:45 +0200 Message-ID: <200810242105.46282.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20081023204326.GB4175@denkbrett.schottelius.org> <200810242056.23272.rjw@sisk.pl> <20081024185541.GL22217@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:47595 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753709AbYJXTBE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:01:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20081024185541.GL22217@kernel.dk> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jens Axboe Cc: Andres Freund , Nico -telmich- Schottelius , Nigel Cunningham , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Jesse Barnes On Friday, 24 of October 2008, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, 24 of October 2008, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 24 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Friday, 24 of October 2008, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Oct 24 2008, Andres Freund wrote: > > > > > > On Friday 24 October 2008 15:01:31 Nico -telmich- Schotteli= us wrote: > > > > > > > > > Chipset Mobile Intel=AE GM45 Express Chipset found > > > > > > > > This is going to be interesting. :-) > > > > > > > > Nico, if the system is 64-bit, I'd recommend trying .28= -rc1. > > > > > > > Yes, I'm on amd64; > > > > > > > As seen on my other post: xorg does not run on .28-rc1 > > > > > > The kernel has a fix for memory management for GM45 cards s= ince 2.6.28-rc1=20 > > > > > > which require a newer driver, so trying this may be benific= al (patch in reply=20 > > > > > > to your first post). > > > > >=20 > > > > > No go, same for me on x60 on ubuntu 8.10-rc1. > > > >=20 > > > > Is this a regression on your box? > > >=20 > > > Yes, definitely. > >=20 > > Which kernel did work? >=20 > 2.6.27, for instance. It's pretty much always worked, the last time i= t > broke was the timer stuff around KS. Other than that, it's been very > solid for a almost 2 years. So it's a recent breakage for you. May be a different issue from the x= 200 one, only the symptoms are similar (well, the symptoms are usually similar i= f failing resume is involved).