From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Subject: Re: [pull request] getting rid of __cpuinit
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:21:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081025162116.GA13303@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081025080638.6203c874@infradead.org>
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 08:06:38AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:35:28 +0200
> Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> > So if you look at the size of the cpuinit/exit sections in the
> > before case you get the real space saving that is lost in the
> > embedded case after your patch is applied.
> > The space savings that happen after early init.
>
> [linux.trees.git]# objdump -h vmlinux.before | grep init.text
> 25 .init.text 00037c25 ffffffff8152a000 000000000152a000 0092a000
> [inux.trees.git]# objdump -h vmlinux.after | grep init.text
> 25 .init.text 000316c2 ffffffff81542000 0000000001542000 00942000
So with your config we will loose a saving of 25955 bytes
of text.
I tried to look a the numbers of a defconfig build here.
cpuinit.text equals 0x5d97 = 23959
cpuinit.data equals 0x3574 = 13684
[objdump of vmlinux.o gives you the size of the cpuinit sections]
So if we decide to drop cpuinit then it should be based on the
above figure and not the 2k figure you gave in the original mail.
Or even better we should see the difference with a typical
embedded configuration and not some big defconfig build.
I will assume the saving is less on a typical embedded
configuration.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-25 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-24 21:20 [pull request] getting rid of __cpuinit Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-24 21:37 ` [PATCH] kbuild: drop cpuinit/cpuexit checks in modpost Sam Ravnborg
2008-10-25 23:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-25 7:59 ` [pull request] getting rid of __cpuinit Sam Ravnborg
2008-10-25 14:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-25 14:35 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-10-25 15:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-25 16:21 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2008-10-25 16:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-25 18:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081025162116.GA13303@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.