From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:03:42 +0100 Message-ID: <200810261203.43348.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <3ZqdCuOdOqB.A.EPE.fJ6AJB@chimera> <20081026071132.GB7639@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081026071132.GB7639@localhost> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Ingo Molnar , Joshua Hoblitt , Thomas Gleixner On Sunday, 26 of October 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > [Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:07:49PM +0200] > | This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > | of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. > | > | The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > | introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should > | be listed and let me know (either way). > | > | > | Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 > | Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? > | Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt > | Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (45 days old) > | References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4 > | Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner > | Cyrill Gorcunov > | Ingo Molnar > | > | > > It's still there but with completely out of 'subject' problems. OK, what subject will be more appropriate? Rafael From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753865AbYJZK7S (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:59:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752504AbYJZK7E (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:59:04 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:53617 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752128AbYJZK7C (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:59:02 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:03:42 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Ingo Molnar , Joshua Hoblitt , Thomas Gleixner References: <3ZqdCuOdOqB.A.EPE.fJ6AJB@chimera> <20081026071132.GB7639@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20081026071132.GB7639@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810261203.43348.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday, 26 of October 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > [Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:07:49PM +0200] > | This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > | of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. > | > | The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > | introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should > | be listed and let me know (either way). > | > | > | Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 > | Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? > | Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt > | Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (45 days old) > | References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4 > | Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner > | Cyrill Gorcunov > | Ingo Molnar > | > | > > It's still there but with completely out of 'subject' problems. OK, what subject will be more appropriate? Rafael