All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] xattr fixes branch
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:06:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081027040657.GC8046@mail.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081025211900.GP15154@wotan.suse.de>

On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 02:19:00PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> 	Thanks for doing this. I've got the patches all pulled into

	No problem.

> 	I'm thinking to keep fixes that will go upstream in the current
> release in a 'fixes' branch. For 2.6.28, I started this from your xattr-28
> branch, put my signoffs on the patches, and added an mmap fix from Tao which
> I had already. This will get rebased every time I send fixes upstream.
> 
> 	For new features, I started a merge_window branch. This worked
> really well for us recently imho. Early in the cycle, this might get rebased
> as large-ish fixes are pushed upstream. By the end of the development cycle
> though (when fixes are smaller), I suspect it won't have to be rebased as
> often, or at all.

	Works for me.  I'll even take on one of the two branches if that
makes your life easier.  Or if you want me to take them at moments your
busy (like we just did), just shout.

> 	If people wouldn't mind developing against some version of
> merge_window, it would make getting all this stuff together much easier. As
> always though, if the choice is between rebasing or doing some PITA merge
> versus getting a high quality feature going, feel free to push the merge
> pain onto me :)

	I think merge_window is great, because our ALL doesn't
distinguish "going to next version" from "marinating".  I wonder,
though, if "merge_window" and "linux-next" don't overlap?  What would be
in "merge_window" that wouldn't also be in "linux-next"?

> 	Right now, merge_window is based on upstream. I'm thinking perhaps
> we should base it on the current 'fixes' branch, since some of them are on
> the large-ish side - that would make getting our patches together more
> smoothly.

	This is probably your call, but this sounds like a good way to
do it.

Joel

-- 

"You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer."
	- Sir Winston Churchill

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127

      reply	other threads:[~2008-10-27  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-24  0:22 [Ocfs2-devel] xattr fixes branch Joel Becker
2008-10-24  0:57 ` Tao Ma
2008-10-24  1:16   ` Joel Becker
2008-10-25 21:19 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-10-27  4:06   ` Joel Becker [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081027040657.GC8046@mail.oracle.com \
    --to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.