From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ocfs2/xattr: Proper hash collision handle in bucket division.v3
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:35:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081027213511.GC25974@mail.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1225058784-15621-1-git-send-email-tao.ma@oracle.com>
Some comment text cleanups, but I'm good with this. Mark, let's push it
to fixes.
Joel
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 06:06:24AM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> Modification from V2 to V3:
> Use a more pefect code suggested by Joel. Thank Joel for it.
>
> In ocfs2/xattr, we must make sure the xattrs which have the same
> hash value exist in the same bucket so that the search schema can
> work. But in the old implementation, when we want to extend a bucket,
> we just move half number of xattrs to the new bucket. This works
> in most cases, but if we are lucky enough we will make 2 xattrs
move 2 xattrs
with the same hash
> into 2 different buckets. This cause a problem that the xattr
means that an xattr from the
previous bucket cannot be found anymore.
> existing in the previous bucket can be found any more. This patch
> fix this problem by finding the right position during extending
> the bucket and extend an empty bucket if needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
> Cc: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
<snip>
> +/*
> + * Move some xattrs in old bucket(blk) to new bucket(new_blk).
> * first_hash will record the 1st hash of the new bucket.
> + *
> + * Normally half nums will be moved. But we have to make sure
Normally half of the xattrs will be moved. But we have to make sure
> + * that the xattr with same hash value is stored in the same
that the xattrs with the same hash value are stored in the same
> + * bucket. If all the xattrs in this bucket has the same hash
have
> + * value, the new bucket will be initialized as an empty one
> + * and the first_hash will be initialized as (hash_value+1).
> */
> -static int ocfs2_half_xattr_bucket(struct inode *inode,
> - handle_t *handle,
> - u64 blk,
> - u64 new_blk,
> - u32 *first_hash,
> - int new_bucket_head)
> +static int ocfs2_divide_xattr_bucket(struct inode *inode,
> + handle_t *handle,
> + u64 blk,
> + u64 new_blk,
> + u32 *first_hash,
> + int new_bucket_head)
> {
> int ret, i;
> - u16 count, start, len, name_value_len, xe_len, name_offset;
> + int count, start, len, name_value_len = 0, xe_len, name_offset = 0;
> u16 blk_per_bucket = ocfs2_blocks_per_xattr_bucket(inode->i_sb);
> struct buffer_head **s_bhs, **t_bhs = NULL;
> struct ocfs2_xattr_header *xh;
> struct ocfs2_xattr_entry *xe;
> int blocksize = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
>
> - mlog(0, "move half of xattrs from bucket %llu to %llu\n",
> + mlog(0, "move some of xattrs from bucket %llu to %llu\n",
> blk, new_blk);
>
> s_bhs = kcalloc(blk_per_bucket, sizeof(struct buffer_head *), GFP_NOFS);
> @@ -3171,14 +3219,35 @@ static int ocfs2_half_xattr_bucket(struct inode *inode,
> }
> }
>
> + xh = (struct ocfs2_xattr_header *)s_bhs[0]->b_data;
> + count = le16_to_cpu(xh->xh_count);
> + start = ocfs2_xattr_find_divide_pos(xh);
> +
> + if (start == count) {
> + xe = &xh->xh_entries[start-1];
> +
> + /*
> + * initialized a new empty bucket here.
> + * The hash value is set as one larger than
> + * that of the last entry in the previous bucket.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < blk_per_bucket; i++)
> + memset(t_bhs[i]->b_data, 0, blocksize);
> +
> + xh = (struct ocfs2_xattr_header *)t_bhs[0]->b_data;
> + xh->xh_free_start = cpu_to_le16(blocksize);
> + xh->xh_entries[0].xe_name_hash = xe->xe_name_hash;
> + le32_add_cpu(&xh->xh_entries[0].xe_name_hash, 1);
> +
> + goto set_num_buckets;
> + }
> +
> /* copy the whole bucket to the new first. */
> for (i = 0; i < blk_per_bucket; i++)
> memcpy(t_bhs[i]->b_data, s_bhs[i]->b_data, blocksize);
>
> /* update the new bucket. */
> xh = (struct ocfs2_xattr_header *)t_bhs[0]->b_data;
> - count = le16_to_cpu(xh->xh_count);
> - start = count / 2;
>
> /*
> * Calculate the total name/value len and xh_free_start for
> @@ -3235,6 +3304,7 @@ static int ocfs2_half_xattr_bucket(struct inode *inode,
> xh->xh_free_start = xe->xe_name_offset;
> }
>
> +set_num_buckets:
> /* set xh->xh_num_buckets for the new xh. */
> if (new_bucket_head)
> xh->xh_num_buckets = cpu_to_le16(1);
> @@ -3253,8 +3323,11 @@ static int ocfs2_half_xattr_bucket(struct inode *inode,
>
> /*
> * Now only update the 1st block of the old bucket.
> - * Please note that the entry has been sorted already above.
> + * If we just add a new empty bucket after it, no needs to modify it.
If we just added a new empty bucket, there is no need to modify it.
> */
> + if (start == count)
> + goto out;
> +
> xh = (struct ocfs2_xattr_header *)s_bhs[0]->b_data;
> memset(&xh->xh_entries[start], 0,
> sizeof(struct ocfs2_xattr_entry) * (count - start));
> @@ -3439,15 +3512,15 @@ out:
> }
>
> /*
> - * Move half of the xattrs in this cluster to the new cluster.
> + * Move some xattrs in this cluster to the new cluster.
> * This function should only be called when bucket size == cluster size.
> * Otherwise ocfs2_mv_xattr_bucket_cross_cluster should be used instead.
> */
> -static int ocfs2_half_xattr_cluster(struct inode *inode,
> - handle_t *handle,
> - u64 prev_blk,
> - u64 new_blk,
> - u32 *first_hash)
> +static int ocfs2_divide_xattr_cluster(struct inode *inode,
> + handle_t *handle,
> + u64 prev_blk,
> + u64 new_blk,
> + u32 *first_hash)
> {
> u16 blk_per_bucket = ocfs2_blocks_per_xattr_bucket(inode->i_sb);
> int ret, credits = 2 * blk_per_bucket;
> @@ -3461,8 +3534,8 @@ static int ocfs2_half_xattr_cluster(struct inode *inode,
> }
>
> /* Move half of the xattr in start_blk to the next bucket. */
> - return ocfs2_half_xattr_bucket(inode, handle, prev_blk,
> - new_blk, first_hash, 1);
> + return ocfs2_divide_xattr_bucket(inode, handle, prev_blk,
> + new_blk, first_hash, 1);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -3524,9 +3597,9 @@ static int ocfs2_adjust_xattr_cross_cluster(struct inode *inode,
> last_blk, new_blk,
> v_start);
> else {
> - ret = ocfs2_half_xattr_cluster(inode, handle,
> - last_blk, new_blk,
> - v_start);
> + ret = ocfs2_divide_xattr_cluster(inode, handle,
> + last_blk, new_blk,
> + v_start);
>
> if ((*header_bh)->b_blocknr == last_blk && extend)
> *extend = 0;
> @@ -3743,8 +3816,8 @@ static int ocfs2_extend_xattr_bucket(struct inode *inode,
> }
>
> /* Move half of the xattr in start_blk to the next bucket. */
> - ret = ocfs2_half_xattr_bucket(inode, handle, start_blk,
> - start_blk + blk_per_bucket, NULL, 0);
> + ret = ocfs2_divide_xattr_bucket(inode, handle, start_blk,
> + start_blk + blk_per_bucket, NULL, 0);
>
> le16_add_cpu(&first_xh->xh_num_buckets, 1);
> ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, first_bh);
> @@ -4435,11 +4508,21 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/* check whether the xattr bucket is filled up with the same hash value. */
> +/*
> + * check whether the xattr bucket is filled up with the same hash value.
> + * If we want to insert the xattr with the same hash, return -ENOSPC.
> + * If we want to insert a xattr with different hash value, go ahead
> + * and ocfs2_divide_xattr_bucket will handle this.
> + */
> static int ocfs2_check_xattr_bucket_collision(struct inode *inode,
> - struct ocfs2_xattr_bucket *bucket)
> + struct ocfs2_xattr_bucket *bucket,
> + const char *name)
> {
> struct ocfs2_xattr_header *xh = bucket->xh;
> + u32 name_hash = ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(inode, name, strlen(name));
> +
> + if (name_hash != le32_to_cpu(xh->xh_entries[0].xe_name_hash))
> + return 0;
>
> if (xh->xh_entries[le16_to_cpu(xh->xh_count) - 1].xe_name_hash ==
> xh->xh_entries[0].xe_name_hash) {
> @@ -4562,7 +4645,9 @@ try_again:
> * one bucket's worth, so check it here whether we need to
> * add a new bucket for the insert.
> */
> - ret = ocfs2_check_xattr_bucket_collision(inode, &xs->bucket);
> + ret = ocfs2_check_xattr_bucket_collision(inode,
> + &xs->bucket,
> + xi->name);
> if (ret) {
> mlog_errno(ret);
> goto out;
> --
> 1.5.4.GIT
>
--
You can use a screwdriver to screw in screws or to clean your ears,
however, the latter needs real skill, determination and a lack of fear
of injuring yourself. It is much the same with JavaScript.
- Chris Heilmann
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-27 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-26 22:06 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ocfs2/xattr: Proper hash collision handle in bucket division.v3 Tao Ma
2008-10-27 21:35 ` Joel Becker [this message]
2008-10-28 22:25 ` Mark Fasheh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081027213511.GC25974@mail.oracle.com \
--to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.