All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra2@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tomas.winkler@intel.com,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Suspend to RAM regression in 2.6.28-rc2 (bisected)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:05:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081027220520.GA4310@localhost.aei.mpg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810272207.43498.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Mon 27.Oct'08 at 22:07:42 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 27 of October 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > On Mon 27.Oct'08 at 21:51:00 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, 27 of October 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > > > On Mon 27.Oct'08 at 20:13:43 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 20:11 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > > Do you get any kernel messages output? If you do, could you put messages
> > > > > > > into each line of ieee80211_set_disassoc to see where it hangs?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > No messages appear, just a black screen.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > But I can use the SysRq keys, and when I umount the
> > > > > > screen shows the message that umount succeed. I also tried SysRq+t but
> > > > > > the messages appear to fast to read.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ok, but that means you _can_ get messages, it would help a lot if you
> > > > > could put a few printks into the set_disassoc function before/after each
> > > > > other function call, so we know where exactly it hangs. Pretty much all
> > > > > of them could possibly hang if there is some sort of locking error
> > > > > happening or anything relies on userspace to be running...
> > > > 
> > > > Ok, I humbly tried to do that with the patch at the end of the email,
> > > > but I did not appear to hang in this function tough.
> > > > 
> > > > Somehow I could get some messages printed when it was a black screen
> > > > before (I think it has to do with the debug level I set with SysRq...)
> > > > and I could see all the printks I've put there. 
> > > > 
> > > > The good thing is that I could get the complete syslog of the boot until 
> > > > the it failed after suspending to RAM (in 2.6.28-rc2 with my debug patch
> > > > below applied). The last messages before the laptop become unresponsive
> > > > (except for the SysRq) were these ones:
> > > > 
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: Registered led device: iwl-phy0:radio
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: Registered led device: iwl-phy0:assoc
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: Registered led device: iwl-phy0:RX
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: Registered led device: iwl-phy0:TX
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: before rcu_read_lock
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: before netif_tx_stop_all_queues
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: before netif_carrier_off
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: before ieee80211_sta
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: inside sef_disconnected 1
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: before ieee8021_led_assoc
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: before ieee8021_sta_send_apinfo
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: before sta_info_unlink
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: before rcu_read_unlock
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: before sta_info_destroy
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1.00: ACPI cmd ef/90:03:00:00:00:a0 succeeded
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1.00: ACPI cmd f5/00:00:00:00:00:a0 filtered out
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1.00: ACPI cmd ef/90:03:00:00:00:a0 succeeded
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1.00: ACPI cmd f5/00:00:00:00:00:a0 filtered out
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x9 t4
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1: irq_stat 0x00000040, connection status changed
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1: hard resetting link
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1.00: ACPI cmd ef/90:03:00:00:00:a0 succeeded
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1.00: ACPI cmd f5/00:00:00:00:00:a0 filtered out
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1.00: ACPI cmd ef/90:03:00:00:00:a0 succeeded
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1.00: ACPI cmd f5/00:00:00:00:00:a0 filtered out
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: ata1: EH complete
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors: (250 GB/232 GiB)
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors: (250 GB/232 GiB)
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:06 localhost kernel: Restarting tasks ... done.
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:07 localhost ifplugd(wlan0)[3182]: Link beat lost.
> > > > Oct 27 21:03:13 localhost ifplugd(wlan0)[3182]: Executing '/etc/ifplugd/ifplugd.action wlan0 down'.
> > > > Oct 27 21:06:20 localhost kernel: SysRq : Changing Loglevel
> > > > Oct 27 21:06:20 localhost kernel: Loglevel set to 4
> > > > Oct 27 21:06:22 localhost kernel: SysRq : Changing Loglevel
> > > > Oct 27 21:06:22 localhost kernel: Loglevel set to 6
> > > > Oct 27 21:06:32 localhost kernel: ffff80251670>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
> > > > Oct 27 21:06:32 localhost kernel:  [<ffffffff8024e200>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x110
> > > > Oct 27 21:06:32 localhost kernel:  [<ffffffff8025119d>] kthread+0x4d/0x80
> > > > Oct 27 21:06:32 localhost kernel:  [<ffffffff8020d1b9>] child_rip+0xa/0x11
> > > > 
> > > > and I have the complete trace also. I can try to put it somewhere in the web if it helps
> > > > (I already tried it, but I am new at the institute here and I could not set up my
> > > > webpage yet :-(
> > > 
> > > Please attach it to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11845 .
> > 
> > Done.
> 
> Hmm, this looks like a result of playing with the magic SysRq.  Did you try to
> press SysRq-something when the box became unresponsive?

Yes, that long trace is the result of SysRq+t but I never managed to
understand its result :-(

This last hang was somewhat different because I could read the messages
up to the point where the laptop was unresponsive (see the time in the
log, I waited 3 minutes until I decided to hit SysRq+t). I am not
sure why this happened, tough. 

All the other hangs were with a complete black screen. _But_ if I used
some SysRq combination during the time the screen was black
I could see the result in the screen. I know this because when the resume
failed I always used to sync+umount+reboot using the SysRq, and those messages
from the SysRq I could read ("Emergency Sync", "Emergency umount" or something
like that).

Ok, now I see I have another patch to test from Tomas...will try that.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-27 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-27 16:20 Suspend to RAM regression in 2.6.28-rc2 (bisected) Carlos R. Mafra
2008-10-27 17:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-27 18:07   ` Soeren Sonnenburg
2008-10-27 18:31     ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-27 18:44       ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-27 19:00         ` Carlos R. Mafra
2008-10-27 19:03           ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-27 19:11             ` Carlos R. Mafra
2008-10-27 19:13               ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-27 20:39                 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2008-10-27 20:51                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-27 20:52                     ` Carlos R. Mafra
2008-10-27 21:07                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-27 22:05                         ` Carlos R. Mafra [this message]
2008-10-27 21:07                     ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-27 22:28                       ` Carlos R. Mafra
2008-10-27 22:40                         ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-27 22:50                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-27 23:12                             ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-27 23:23                               ` Harvey Harrison
2008-10-28 15:30                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-28 16:12                                 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-28  6:32                       ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-10-27 19:06           ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-27 19:09             ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-27 19:13               ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-27 19:16                 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-27 19:20                   ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-27 17:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-27 17:57   ` Carlos R. Mafra
2008-10-27 18:00     ` John W. Linville
2008-10-27 18:16     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-27 18:36       ` Carlos R. Mafra
2008-10-27 18:51         ` Carlos R. Mafra
2008-10-27 20:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-10-27 21:06   ` Harvey Harrison

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081027220520.GA4310@localhost.aei.mpg.de \
    --to=crmafra2@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kernel@nn7.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.