From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [81.169.183.159] (helo=coruscant.onosendai.de) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KvVt2-0003nP-A5 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:40:24 +0100 Received: from imp050244.vpn.mi.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.50.244] helo=tamarin.localnet) by coruscant.onosendai.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KvVs3-0002Ko-OB for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:39:23 +0100 From: Holger Freyther To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:39:17 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.1 (Linux/2.6.27-7-generic; KDE/4.1.2; i686; ; ) References: <20081030101903.GA8716@walkingice> <49099314.5030909@smartlink.ee> In-Reply-To: <49099314.5030909@smartlink.ee> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200810301239.18157.zecke@selfish.org> Subject: Re: A patch for autotools.bbclas which correct .la file X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:40:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 30 October 2008 11:57:24 Kalev Lember wrote: > I think it might not be a good idea to do it in do_install_append(), > because lots of recipes which inherit autotools bbclass also define > do_install_append(). So the current approach would fix some, but break a > set of other packages. why? got an example? z.