From: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: nohz regression with upstream git
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:00:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081031020030.GA4506@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
Thomas,
I am seeing a nohz regression on one of my dual core mobile test boxes.
With 2.6.27 tickless idle works fine.
With latest git, I see ~2000 interrupts per second (HZ=1000), even when idle.
git bisect points towards
commit fb02fbc14d17837b4b7b02dbb36142c16a7bf208
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri Oct 17 10:01:23 2008 +0200
NOHZ: restart tick device from irq_enter()
And good powertop data
PowerTOP 1.10 (C) 2007, 2008 Intel Corporation
Collecting data for 15 seconds
Cn Avg residency
C0 (cpu running) ( 0.1%)
polling 0.0ms ( 0.0%)
C1 0.0ms ( 0.0%)
C3 18.6ms (99.9%)
P-states (frequencies)
2.21 Ghz 0.0%
2.21 Ghz 0.0%
1.60 Ghz 0.0%
800 Mhz 100.0%
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 53.9 interval: 15.0s
no ACPI power usage estimate available
Top causes for wakeups:
65.5% ( 32.6) <interrupt> : extra timer interrupt
16.7% ( 8.3) <kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts
3.3% ( 1.7) kacpid : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
2.8% ( 1.4) <interrupt> : ata_piix, uhci_hcd:usb4
2.3% ( 1.1) <interrupt> : eth1
2.0% ( 1.0) <kernel core> : enqueue_task_rt (sched_rt_period_timer)
1.9% ( 0.9) <kernel core> : schedule_delayed_work_on (delayed_work_timer_fn)
1.1% ( 0.5) <kernel core> : neigh_table_init_no_netlink (neigh_periodic_timer)
1.1% ( 0.5) <kernel core> : e1000_intr_msi (e1000_watchdog)
0.7% ( 0.3) <kernel IPI> : Function call interrupts
0.4% ( 0.2) events/1 : __netdev_watchdog_up (dev_watchdog)
0.4% ( 0.2) sendmail : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
0.4% ( 0.2) <kernel core> : page_writeback_init (wb_timer_fn)
0.3% ( 0.1) kerneloops : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
0.3% ( 0.1) kerneloops : do_nanosleep (hrtimer_wakeup)
0.1% ( 0.1) sshd : sk_reset_timer (tcp_write_timer)
0.1% ( 0.1) events/1 : queue_delayed_work (delayed_work_timer_fn)
0.1% ( 0.1) mount : start_this_handle (commit_timeout)
0.1% ( 0.1) <kernel core> : queue_delayed_work (delayed_work_timer_fn)
0.1% ( 0.1) hald-addon-stor : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
0.1% ( 0.1) <kernel core> : neigh_add_timer (neigh_timer_handler)
0.1% ( 0.1) <kernel core> : sk_reset_timer (tcp_delack_timer)
and bad powertop data
PowerTOP 1.10 (C) 2007, 2008 Intel Corporation
Collecting data for 15 seconds
Cn Avg residency
C0 (cpu running) ( 5.6%)
polling 0.0ms ( 0.0%)
C1 1.2ms ( 0.0%)
C3 0.5ms (94.4%)
P-states (frequencies)
2.21 Ghz 0.0%
2.21 Ghz 0.0%
1.60 Ghz 0.0%
800 Mhz 100.0%
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 1919.6 interval: 15.0s
no ACPI power usage estimate available
Top causes for wakeups:
99.0% (1902.4) <interrupt> : extra timer interrupt
0.3% ( 6.1) <kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts
0.3% ( 5.6) <interrupt> : acpi
0.1% ( 1.4) <interrupt> : ata_piix, uhci_hcd:usb4
0.1% ( 1.1) <interrupt> : ata_piix, ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb6
0.1% ( 1.1) <interrupt> : eth1
0.1% ( 1.0) <kernel core> : enqueue_task_rt (sched_rt_period_timer)
0.0% ( 0.9) <kernel core> : schedule_delayed_work_on (delayed_work_timer_fn)
0.0% ( 0.5) NetworkManager : e1000_intr_msi (e1000_watchdog)
0.0% ( 0.5) <kernel core> : neigh_table_init_no_netlink (neigh_periodic_timer)
0.0% ( 0.2) <kernel core> : page_writeback_init (wb_timer_fn)
0.0% ( 0.2) events/1 : __netdev_watchdog_up (dev_watchdog)
0.0% ( 0.2) sendmail : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
0.0% ( 0.1) kerneloops : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
0.0% ( 0.1) events/0 : sk_reset_timer (tcp_delack_timer)
0.0% ( 0.1) sshd : sk_reset_timer (tcp_write_timer)
0.0% ( 0.1) events/0 : neigh_add_timer (neigh_timer_handler)
0.0% ( 0.1) rsyslogd : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
0.0% ( 0.1) rpcbind : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
0.0% ( 0.1) mount : start_this_handle (commit_timeout)
0.0% ( 0.1) hald : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
0.0% ( 0.1) crond : do_nanosleep (hrtimer_wakeup)
0.0% ( 0.1) <kernel core> : queue_delayed_work (delayed_work_timer_fn)
0.0% ( 0.1) hald-addon-stor : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
Not sure what is so specific about this platform that causes this problem.
Its a regular Centrino 2 development box.
I will poke more at this tomorrow. But, wanted to pass the info on to you
before calling it a night.
Let me know if you need any more info on this.
Thanks,
Venki
next reply other threads:[~2008-10-31 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-31 2:00 Venki Pallipadi [this message]
2008-10-31 9:43 ` nohz regression with upstream git Simon Holm Thøgersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081031020030.GA4506@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.