All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH PPC_4xx V3] Print simple row of dots instead of spinning wheel
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:09:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810311009.47348.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081031084554.2A80C874DB9E@gemini.denx.de>

Hi Wolfgang,

On Friday 31 October 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Of course the end result looks better. There is no doubt about  that.
> But  it  has  disadvantages, too. With the row of dots you can easily
> see how long you've been waiting  -  this  visualizes  variations  in
> timing  behaviour  that  may  be  indications  for  problems; also it
> clearly shows where we have to wait too long,  i.  e.  where  optimi-
> zations are needed.
>
> > I understand that the spinning wheel is not optimal for logfiles, but for
> > the normal usage it just looks nicer for my taste. So I would prefer to
> > stay with the spinning wheel, but if you decide that the 4xx DDR2
> > calibration mustn't use this, then let's apply your patch for the
> > cpu/ppc4xx files.
>
> It is my understanding that a rework of this code is under way  which
> will  avoid  the  long delay for the standard boot sequence (and only
> need it for board bringup or  intentional  recalibration).

Are you talking about storing the optimized autocalibration values in FLASH, 
as discussed on IRC some time ago? I don't know if somebody is working on 
this. I only know that AMCC is working on a fix for the autocalibration on 
Kilauea. Not sure if this effects the bootup time, I can only hope it does.

> For  this 
> purpose, the row of dots is IMHO more useful than the spinning wheel.
>
> Assuming my understanding is correct (is it?), then we could fix this
> now as well.

Again, if you decide that that's the way to go, then I will not object.

Best regards,
Stefan

=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-31  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-23 10:59 [U-Boot] [PATCH PPC_4xx V3] Print simple row of dots instead of spinning wheel Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-23 11:08 ` Stefan Roese
2008-10-23 11:17   ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-28 23:05   ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-27 14:18 ` Matthias Fuchs
2008-10-30 23:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-31  7:54   ` Stefan Roese
2008-10-31  8:45     ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-31  9:09       ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2008-10-31 11:20         ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-31 12:06           ` Stefan Roese
2008-10-31 12:41             ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200810311009.47348.sr@denx.de \
    --to=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.