From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 13:26:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081102132650.GA13084@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <490DAA33.7010905@tuffmail.co.uk>
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 01:25:07PM +0000, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> No, the current rfkill core forces the device to restore the state on
> resume. So it can't be of sync after resume. And there's no way for
> the platform driver to affect this behaviour, aside from illegally
> generating input events.
Oh, so it does. Yeah, in that case I don't see any real point in
changing it.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-02 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-31 17:09 eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4 and 5 Alan Jenkins
2008-10-31 17:11 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-10-31 17:27 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-10-31 20:54 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-11-02 4:00 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-02 11:17 ` eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4 Alan Jenkins
2008-11-02 13:06 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-02 13:25 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-11-02 13:26 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2008-11-03 14:47 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-03 14:16 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-03 14:18 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-03 14:29 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-11-03 14:51 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-03 14:55 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-03 15:02 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-03 15:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-03 16:33 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-03 18:00 ` rfkill, stupid question #6 Alan Jenkins
2008-11-03 19:06 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-04 15:48 ` eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4 Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-11-04 15:57 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-11-02 3:46 ` eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4 and 5 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-02 9:21 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081102132650.GA13084@srcf.ucam.org \
--to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.