From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] rfkill fixes for 2.6.28-rc3
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:20:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811031820.41165.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081103170243.GB2417@khazad-dum.debian.net>
On Monday 03 November 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Nov 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > On Monday 03 November 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > This small patchset contains two fixes to issues in the suspend/resume
> > > handling of the rfkill class core.
> > >
> > > It needs to go to 2.6.28. These patches are based on 2.6.28-rc3.
> >
> > Are they real regressions or normal bugfixes?
>
> I am not sure if they regress anything, but I am pretty sure there is no
> bugzilla entry about them yet. I have added two more interested parties to
> the CC.
>
> So, if there is a strong feeling this would best be held until the next
> merge window, I can certainly respin the patches to on top of
> wireless-testing...
Well I'll give my ACK to the 2 patches, but I'll let john decide if they
are "regression" enough for 2.6.28. ;)
Ivo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-03 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-03 16:42 [GIT PATCH] rfkill fixes for 2.6.28-rc3 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-03 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] rfkill: preserve state across suspend Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-03 17:20 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-11-03 16:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] rfkill: always call get_state() hook on resume Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-03 17:20 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-11-03 16:47 ` [GIT PATCH] rfkill fixes for 2.6.28-rc3 Ivo van Doorn
2008-11-03 17:02 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-03 17:20 ` Ivo van Doorn [this message]
2008-11-12 21:15 ` John W. Linville
2008-11-14 0:16 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-20 2:00 ` John W. Linville
2008-11-20 10:51 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-20 15:03 ` John W. Linville
2008-11-21 22:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] rfkill: preserve state across suspend Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-21 22:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] rfkill: always call get_state() hook on resume Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-20 16:27 ` [GIT PATCH] rfkill fixes for 2.6.28-rc3 drago01
2008-11-20 16:31 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-20 16:54 ` drago01
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811031820.41165.IvDoorn@gmail.com \
--to=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.