From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:20:22 +0000
Subject: Re: mlmmj-1.2.16-PRE2 released
Message-Id: <20081103182022.GA5797@arachsys.com>
List-Id: <mlmmj.mlmmj.org>
References: <1225668062.14901.42.camel@mopo-laptop>
In-Reply-To: <1225668062.14901.42.camel@mopo-laptop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org

"Morten K. Poulsen" <mopo@fabletech.com> writes:

> Am I still missing something?

For a long time now, I've done something clumsy along the lines of

  find . -name '*recieve*' | while read F; do mv $F `sed 's/recieve/receive/g' <<< "$F"`; done
  find . -name '*voodo*' | while read F; do mv $F `sed 's/voodo/voodoo/g' <<< "$F"`; done
  find . -type f | while read F; do sed -e s/recieve/receive/g -e s/voodo/voodoo/g -i $F; done

as part of my package build for mlmmj. It'd be nice to get these trivial
spelling clean-ups upstream: how would you feel about a patch correcting the
spelling of 'receive' and 'voodoo' through the code and filenames if I were
to generate one?

Of course, we could install a symlink from mlmmj-receive-strip to
mlmmj-recieve-strip so nothing will break for people using the old,
incorrectly spelled binary name.

Cheers,

Chris.