From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Kumba <kumba@gentoo.org>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
Linux MIPS List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
rdsandiford@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: R10000 Needs LL/SC Workaround in Gcc
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 09:04:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081104090410.GC7291@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <490FF63A.7010900@gentoo.org>
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:14:02AM -0500, Kumba wrote:
>> Agreed, but that's just as true of option 1. Each option is as correct
>> as the other. It's just a question of whether we need the combination:
>>
>> -mips1 -mllsc -mfix-r10000
>>
>> to be accepted, or whether we can treat it as a compile-time error.
>
> Hmm, which do you think makes sense? From a usage perspective, most
It's a crude way of asking for a generic MIPS binary that runs on anything
but works best on MIPS II+.
Makes me wonder if there is a point in having a single gcc option, something
like -march=generic which selects something like this, including all
workarounds?
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-04 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-31 5:00 [PATCH]: R10000 Needs LL/SC Workaround in Gcc Kumba
2008-10-31 14:24 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-01 7:30 ` Kumba
2008-11-01 17:41 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-01 18:49 ` Kumba
2008-11-01 19:42 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-02 0:00 ` Kumba
2008-11-02 10:00 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-03 9:01 ` Kumba
2008-11-03 20:47 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-04 0:04 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-11-04 7:14 ` Kumba
2008-11-04 9:04 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2008-11-04 14:26 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-04 14:31 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-11-04 14:23 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-08 9:37 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-08 18:20 ` Markus Gothe
2008-11-10 6:09 ` Kumba
2008-11-11 23:13 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-11 23:28 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-11 23:40 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-12 7:42 ` Kumba
2008-11-13 23:10 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-14 8:14 ` Kumba
2008-11-15 14:28 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-16 7:35 ` Kumba
2008-11-02 10:49 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-02 11:34 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-03 16:51 ` Paul_Koning
2008-11-03 16:51 ` Paul_Koning
2008-11-03 16:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-03 17:35 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-11-01 20:33 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-01 23:45 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081104090410.GC7291@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kumba@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rdsandiford@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.