From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0.towertech.it (mx0.towertech.it [213.215.222.73]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FD7CDDED1 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:06:42 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:59:55 +0100 From: Alessandro Zummo To: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: rtc-ppc Message-ID: <20081105235955.28436136@i1501.lan.towertech.it> In-Reply-To: <1225923526.3882.3.camel@macbook.infradead.org> References: <20081105021901.49dffc3e@i1501.lan.towertech.it> <1225923526.3882.3.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:18:46 +0100 David Woodhouse wrote: > It would be possible, yes -- but it would be better to have the various > PPC platforms just register RTC-class devices _directly_, and ditch the > RTC bits from ppc_md altogether. That would be real fine :) > I think we're waiting until the RTC class works with NTP before we can > contemplate that, though. That will be a long wait, I don't think anyone volunteered for the ntp code. I've been told some platforms are already using the class. -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it