From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754446AbYKFGxR (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:53:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752659AbYKFGw7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:52:59 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:34702 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751609AbYKFGw6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:52:58 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 07:52:40 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ftrace: start stop infrastructure changes Message-ID: <20081106065240.GC15731@elte.hu> References: <20081105212428.148612398@goodmis.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081105212428.148612398@goodmis.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE RBL: Envelope sender in blackholes.securitysage.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Steven Rostedt wrote: > Note, I'm now trying to learn to use git. I am experimenting with > using a combination of quilt and git. I set up a git repo at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git > > This series is in the tip/devel branch. > > I'll put my changes in that branch and then send out the patches > as I have always done. But the introduction will list the shortlog > of the changes, then followed by the patches themselves. > > I do this by using git format-patch and then having quilt send > out the queue that was produced. > > I plan on automating a lot of this, but for this run, it was > done manually. Worked fine on my side - and it's easier than processing patches in email: the ordering and dependencies are more obvious. The only flip side is that it's harder to fix small details in commit logs in an ad-hoc way. So be prepared to see more nitpicking from me for such details :-) Ingo