From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ky3yS-0005ik-A0 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:28:34 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:28:00 -0200 From: Eduardo Habkost Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] x86: disable virt on kdump and emergency_restart Message-ID: <20081106122800.GN5247@blackpad> References: <1225810364-8990-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <49107E2C.8090803@redhat.com> <20081105163306.GA30018@elte.hu> <4912BDC5.3000508@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4912BDC5.3000508@redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Avi Kivity Cc: Andrew Morton , kvm@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Haren Myneni , Simon Horman , "Eric W. Biederman" , Ingo Molnar , Andrey Borzenkov , mingo@redhat.com, Vivek Goyal On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 11:49:57AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> general ack for the x86 bits, but i'm not sure whether we should be >> pushing this upstream so late in the cycle. If we do it in the next >> cycle then it's best we do it in the x86 tree, the KVM impact seems >> much smaller than the general x86 impact. >> > > It certainly doesn't fall under the recent regression rule, and there's > a simple workaround (rmmod -r kvm) so I agree it's best to defer for the > next cycle. Shouldn't reboot=kbd be the default again still during this cycle, then? The cases where the new reboot=acpi default broke didn't necessarily involve KVM. -- Eduardo _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754857AbYKFM3b (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 07:29:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754010AbYKFM3L (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 07:29:11 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:48167 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753953AbYKFM3J (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 07:29:09 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:28:00 -0200 From: Eduardo Habkost To: Avi Kivity Cc: Ingo Molnar , "Eric W. Biederman" , Simon Horman , Andrew Morton , Vivek Goyal , Haren Myneni , Andrey Borzenkov , mingo@redhat.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , kexec@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] x86: disable virt on kdump and emergency_restart Message-ID: <20081106122800.GN5247@blackpad> References: <1225810364-8990-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <49107E2C.8090803@redhat.com> <20081105163306.GA30018@elte.hu> <4912BDC5.3000508@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4912BDC5.3000508@redhat.com> X-Fnord: you can see the fnord User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 11:49:57AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> general ack for the x86 bits, but i'm not sure whether we should be >> pushing this upstream so late in the cycle. If we do it in the next >> cycle then it's best we do it in the x86 tree, the KVM impact seems >> much smaller than the general x86 impact. >> > > It certainly doesn't fall under the recent regression rule, and there's > a simple workaround (rmmod -r kvm) so I agree it's best to defer for the > next cycle. Shouldn't reboot=kbd be the default again still during this cycle, then? The cases where the new reboot=acpi default broke didn't necessarily involve KVM. -- Eduardo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eduardo Habkost Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] x86: disable virt on kdump and emergency_restart Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:28:00 -0200 Message-ID: <20081106122800.GN5247@blackpad> References: <1225810364-8990-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <49107E2C.8090803@redhat.com> <20081105163306.GA30018@elte.hu> <4912BDC5.3000508@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Morton , kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kexec-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Haren Myneni , Simon Horman , "Eric W. Biederman" , Ingo Molnar , Andrey Borzenkov , mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Vivek Goyal To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4912BDC5.3000508-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kexec-bounces-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+glkk-kexec=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 11:49:57AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> general ack for the x86 bits, but i'm not sure whether we should be >> pushing this upstream so late in the cycle. If we do it in the next >> cycle then it's best we do it in the x86 tree, the KVM impact seems >> much smaller than the general x86 impact. >> > > It certainly doesn't fall under the recent regression rule, and there's > a simple workaround (rmmod -r kvm) so I agree it's best to defer for the > next cycle. Shouldn't reboot=kbd be the default again still during this cycle, then? The cases where the new reboot=acpi default broke didn't necessarily involve KVM. -- Eduardo