From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Arthur Jones <ajones@riverbed.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext3: kernel BUG at fs/jbd/journal.c:412!
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:13:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081106171322.GD18939@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081106161227.GA9254@ajones-laptop.nbttech.com>
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 08:12:27AM -0800, Arthur Jones wrote:
> Hi Aneesh, ...
>
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 07:50:25AM -0800, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > I get this with ext4-patchqueue. I guess we have some ext3 patches queued there.
>
> This could be related to a patch I just posted.
>
> See the thread on linux-ext4 called "ext3: slow symlink corruption
> on umount" for details on how this patch came about...
No this is the other ext3 patch we have in the patch tree. I see the
problem, we're calling __log_space_left in a diagnostic printk after
we've released the j_state_lock. Here's the incremental fix:
diff --git a/fs/jbd/checkpoint.c b/fs/jbd/checkpoint.c
index 5e856de..18e5137 100644
--- a/fs/jbd/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/jbd/checkpoint.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static int __try_to_free_cp_buf(struct journal_head *jh)
*/
void __log_wait_for_space(journal_t *journal)
{
- int nblocks;
+ int nblocks, space_left;
assert_spin_locked(&journal->j_state_lock);
nblocks = jbd_space_needed(journal);
@@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ void __log_wait_for_space(journal_t *journal)
spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
nblocks = jbd_space_needed(journal);
- if (__log_space_left(journal) < nblocks) {
+ space_left = __log_space_left(journal);
+ if (space_left < nblocks) {
int chkpt = journal->j_checkpoint_transactions != NULL;
int tid = 0;
@@ -157,8 +158,7 @@ void __log_wait_for_space(journal_t *journal)
} else {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: needed %d blocks and "
"only had %d space available\n",
- __func__, nblocks,
- __log_space_left(journal));
+ __func__, nblocks, space_left);
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: no way to get more "
"journal space\n", __func__);
WARN_ON(1);
This is in a "should never happen path", though. What were you doing
to trigger it?
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-06 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-06 15:50 ext3: kernel BUG at fs/jbd/journal.c:412! Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-06 16:12 ` Arthur Jones
2008-11-06 16:43 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-06 17:13 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-11-06 17:16 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-06 17:32 ` Theodore Tso
2008-11-06 17:38 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-06 17:23 ` Arthur Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081106171322.GD18939@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=ajones@riverbed.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.