From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree build failure
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:06:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081107230611.GA400@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081108095950.259305aa.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 09:59:50AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Harvey,
>
> On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 09:43:57 -0800 Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Is it really fair to drop the v4l tree when it was -staging that broke? I'd humbly
> > suggest that staging be weighted somewhat lower than the other trees.
>
> There is no staging tree in linux-next, that driver is in Linus' tree. I
> agree that if there was a staging tree, it would be much lower priority.
>
> Maybe we need some way to exclude the staging directory from
> all{yes,mod}config builds ...
Ah, ok, that makes more sense.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-07 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-07 3:30 linux-next: v4l-dvb tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-07 17:43 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-11-07 18:41 ` Greg KH
2008-11-07 23:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-12 0:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-11-12 22:45 ` Greg KH
2008-11-07 22:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-07 23:06 ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-11-08 3:05 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-08 4:38 ` Greg KH
2008-11-08 5:08 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-27 6:59 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-27 23:24 ` Andy Walls
2010-01-28 1:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-01-28 5:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-07 0:58 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-07 1:20 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-04-07 4:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-27 0:40 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-27 11:28 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-03-27 14:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-05 0:35 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-05 21:51 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-03-06 0:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-06 1:15 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-03-02 0:05 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-02 0:08 ` Michael Krufky
2009-03-02 0:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-02 2:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-12-08 2:07 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-01 23:37 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-02 10:03 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-12-02 22:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-03 22:48 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-12-03 0:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-03 22:49 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-11-25 4:41 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-29 2:20 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-29 12:26 ` Andreas Oberritter
2008-11-03 1:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-05 1:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081107230611.GA400@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.