From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756609AbYKIVi0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:38:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756202AbYKIViF (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:38:05 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:45444 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756475AbYKIViE (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:38:04 -0500 Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 22:37:38 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Rusty Russell , Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Mike Travis , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask: introduce new API, without changing anything Message-ID: <20081109213738.GA20267@elte.hu> References: <20081029152849.3883d072.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081107093911.GD7787@elte.hu> <20081107122400.GA20777@elte.hu> <200811082024.20157.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20081109201600.GA22208@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081109201600.GA22208@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE RBL: Envelope sender in blackholes.securitysage.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > > > > Ok, I sent through the latest delta on top of this before, but see below. > > > > Can somebody send a final patch-set to me? Right now I have multiple > > versions of patches, apparently on top of each other, and sometimes > > multiple patches per email. Very confusing, and I do _not_ want to > > apply the wrong thing by mistake. > > I've got them collected and tested (and so has Rusty), see the tree > URI below. There's no pending problem left that i know of. I also > just did a fresh test-build and test-boot of this tree, for good > measure. Thomas did a cross-build test of Linus's latest (v2.6.28-rc3-261-g8b805ef), and it seems OK (see the results below) - no new cross-build failures introduced. Ingo ---------------> Run 142: 2008-11-09 21:38:04 .. 2008-11-09 22:30:35 Run 142: 17 of 19 operations OK Run 142: 2 of 19 operations FAILED http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/000142-0008-0005.log http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/000142-0008-0015.log Changed warnings: http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/d000141-000142-0008-0006.log http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/d000141-000142-0008-0023.log http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/d000141-000142-0008-0024.log Full results at: http://www.tglx.de/autoqa/index _______________________________________________ autoqa mailing list autoqa@www.tglx.de http://www.tglx.de/mailman/listinfo/autoqa