All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ring-buffer: add reader lock
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:45:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081111204622.763579486@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20081111204555.890501283@goodmis.org

[-- Attachment #1: 0002-ring-buffer-add-reader-lock.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6832 bytes --]

Impact: serialize reader accesses to individual CPU ring buffers

The code in the ring buffer expects only one reader at a time, but currently
it puts that requirement on the caller. This is not strong enough, and this
patch adds a "reader_lock" that serializes the access to the reader API
of the ring buffer.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c |  109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 0a4f5c3..e3703b2 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ static inline int test_time_stamp(u64 delta)
 struct ring_buffer_per_cpu {
 	int				cpu;
 	struct ring_buffer		*buffer;
+	spinlock_t			reader_lock;
 	raw_spinlock_t			lock;
 	struct lock_class_key		lock_key;
 	struct list_head		pages;
@@ -348,6 +349,7 @@ rb_allocate_cpu_buffer(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
 
 	cpu_buffer->cpu = cpu;
 	cpu_buffer->buffer = buffer;
+	spin_lock_init(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
 	cpu_buffer->lock = (raw_spinlock_t)__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpu_buffer->pages);
 
@@ -1509,6 +1511,9 @@ unsigned long ring_buffer_overruns(struct ring_buffer *buffer)
 void ring_buffer_iter_reset(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter)
 {
 	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer = iter->cpu_buffer;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 
 	/* Iterator usage is expected to have record disabled */
 	if (list_empty(&cpu_buffer->reader_page->list)) {
@@ -1522,6 +1527,8 @@ void ring_buffer_iter_reset(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter)
 		iter->read_stamp = cpu_buffer->read_stamp;
 	else
 		iter->read_stamp = iter->head_page->time_stamp;
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1740,17 +1747,8 @@ static void rb_advance_iter(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter)
 		rb_advance_iter(iter);
 }
 
-/**
- * ring_buffer_peek - peek at the next event to be read
- * @buffer: The ring buffer to read
- * @cpu: The cpu to peak at
- * @ts: The timestamp counter of this event.
- *
- * This will return the event that will be read next, but does
- * not consume the data.
- */
-struct ring_buffer_event *
-ring_buffer_peek(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu, u64 *ts)
+static struct ring_buffer_event *
+rb_buffer_peek(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu, u64 *ts)
 {
 	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
 	struct ring_buffer_event *event;
@@ -1812,16 +1810,8 @@ ring_buffer_peek(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu, u64 *ts)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-/**
- * ring_buffer_iter_peek - peek at the next event to be read
- * @iter: The ring buffer iterator
- * @ts: The timestamp counter of this event.
- *
- * This will return the event that will be read next, but does
- * not increment the iterator.
- */
-struct ring_buffer_event *
-ring_buffer_iter_peek(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter, u64 *ts)
+static struct ring_buffer_event *
+rb_iter_peek(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter, u64 *ts)
 {
 	struct ring_buffer *buffer;
 	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
@@ -1883,6 +1873,51 @@ ring_buffer_iter_peek(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter, u64 *ts)
 }
 
 /**
+ * ring_buffer_peek - peek at the next event to be read
+ * @buffer: The ring buffer to read
+ * @cpu: The cpu to peak at
+ * @ts: The timestamp counter of this event.
+ *
+ * This will return the event that will be read next, but does
+ * not consume the data.
+ */
+struct ring_buffer_event *
+ring_buffer_peek(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu, u64 *ts)
+{
+	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
+	struct ring_buffer_event *event;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+	event = rb_buffer_peek(buffer, cpu, ts);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+
+	return event;
+}
+
+/**
+ * ring_buffer_iter_peek - peek at the next event to be read
+ * @iter: The ring buffer iterator
+ * @ts: The timestamp counter of this event.
+ *
+ * This will return the event that will be read next, but does
+ * not increment the iterator.
+ */
+struct ring_buffer_event *
+ring_buffer_iter_peek(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter, u64 *ts)
+{
+	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer = iter->cpu_buffer;
+	struct ring_buffer_event *event;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+	event = rb_iter_peek(iter, ts);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+
+	return event;
+}
+
+/**
  * ring_buffer_consume - return an event and consume it
  * @buffer: The ring buffer to get the next event from
  *
@@ -1893,19 +1928,24 @@ ring_buffer_iter_peek(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter, u64 *ts)
 struct ring_buffer_event *
 ring_buffer_consume(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu, u64 *ts)
 {
-	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
+	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
 	struct ring_buffer_event *event;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (!cpu_isset(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
 		return NULL;
 
-	event = ring_buffer_peek(buffer, cpu, ts);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+
+	event = rb_buffer_peek(buffer, cpu, ts);
 	if (!event)
-		return NULL;
+		goto out;
 
-	cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
 	rb_advance_reader(cpu_buffer);
 
+ out:
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+
 	return event;
 }
 
@@ -1942,11 +1982,11 @@ ring_buffer_read_start(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
 	atomic_inc(&cpu_buffer->record_disabled);
 	synchronize_sched();
 
-	local_irq_save(flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 	__raw_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
 	ring_buffer_iter_reset(iter);
 	__raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
-	local_irq_restore(flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 
 	return iter;
 }
@@ -1978,12 +2018,17 @@ struct ring_buffer_event *
 ring_buffer_read(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter, u64 *ts)
 {
 	struct ring_buffer_event *event;
+	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer = iter->cpu_buffer;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-	event = ring_buffer_iter_peek(iter, ts);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+	event = rb_iter_peek(iter, ts);
 	if (!event)
-		return NULL;
+		goto out;
 
 	rb_advance_iter(iter);
+ out:
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 
 	return event;
 }
@@ -2032,13 +2077,15 @@ void ring_buffer_reset_cpu(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
 	if (!cpu_isset(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
 		return;
 
-	local_irq_save(flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+
 	__raw_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
 
 	rb_reset_cpu(cpu_buffer);
 
 	__raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
-	local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
1.5.6.5

-- 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-11-11 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-11 20:45 [PATCH 0/3] ftrace: updates for linux-tip Steven Rostedt
2008-11-11 20:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] ring-buffer: buffer record on/off switch Steven Rostedt
2008-11-11 20:45 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2008-11-11 20:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] ring-buffer: clean up warn ons Steven Rostedt
2008-11-11 20:59 ` [PATCH 0/3] ftrace: updates for linux-tip Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081111204622.763579486@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.