From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH] convert cnt32_to_63 to inline Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:13:06 +0000 Message-ID: <20081111211306.GA12739@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20081109162250.GB10181@Krystal> <20081109204256.89ab7925.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081110135850.0d620f3c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081110152221.64948d23.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081111182759.GA8052@Krystal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, dhowells@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, davem@davemloft.net, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 04:00:46PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > No thank you. If this trend continues I'm going to make it back private > to ARM again so you could pessimize your own code as much as you want. As I've already stated several days ago, I think that's the right course of action. Given all the concerns raised, it's clearly not something that should have been allowed to become generic. So, let's just close this discussion off by taking that course of action. What's required is (in order): 1. a local copy for NM10300 needs to be created and it converted to that 2. these two commits then need to be reverted: bc173c5789e1fc6065fd378edc815914b40ee86b b4f151ff899362fec952c45d166252c9912c041f Then our usage is again limited to sched_clock() which is well understood and known to be problem free. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: