From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>
To: "Lovich, Vitali" <vlovich@qualcomm.com>
Cc: Johann Baudy <johaahn@gmail.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Packet socket: mmapped IO: PACKET_TX_RING
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:11:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081112181134.GA5396@ioremap.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FCC0EC655BD1AE408C047268D1F5DF4C3BA61260@NASANEXMB10.na.qualcomm.com>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:59:20AM -0800, Lovich, Vitali (vlovich@qualcomm.com) wrote:
> They aren't racy - not in the sense that your suggestion would make it. With current splice & sendfile, when it returns from the syscall, the user knows that it has been transmitted and thus can continue using the file descriptors & memory (in the case of vmsplice). However, with your suggestion, the user could actually never know when it's safe to write into memory (even in a single-threaded situation). Thus it is racy in a single-threaded situation (even on a UP it's potentially racy) which is a pretty amazing feat. Consider:
Problem is, that when sendfile() returns nothing has been transferred.
And in some NICs it will take a while to actually make a transfer.
And what you wrote below is exactly the same problem as exists with
splice/sendfile in particular and ->sendpage() in general.
Please also update your mailer to wrap strings into 80-or-so lines, it
is hard to answer into the middle of the paragraph.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-12 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-31 10:58 [PATCH] Packet socket: mmapped IO: PACKET_TX_RING Johann Baudy
2008-10-31 17:07 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-10-31 18:24 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-04 22:45 ` Johann Baudy
2008-11-06 0:47 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-06 8:03 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-06 18:49 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-06 19:40 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-06 19:53 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-07 16:36 ` Johann Baudy
2008-11-07 17:19 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-10 20:29 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-11 0:29 ` Lovich, Vitali
[not found] ` <7e0dd21a0811110656yff651afp8ff0f9928b79f545@mail.gmail.com>
2008-11-11 14:59 ` Johann Baudy
2008-11-11 19:05 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-11 12:10 ` Johann Baudy
2008-11-11 17:44 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-11 18:08 ` Johann Baudy
2008-11-11 18:19 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-11 18:59 ` Johann Baudy
2008-11-11 19:10 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-12 12:09 ` Johann Baudy
2008-11-12 17:12 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-11 11:43 ` Johann Baudy
2008-11-11 17:38 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-11 17:50 ` Johann Baudy
2008-11-11 18:14 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-11 18:50 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-11 19:19 ` Johann Baudy
2008-11-11 19:29 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-12 13:43 ` Johann Baudy
2008-11-12 13:58 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-12 17:07 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-12 17:41 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-12 17:59 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-12 18:11 ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2008-11-12 19:05 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-12 19:14 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-12 21:23 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-12 21:46 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-12 22:33 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-18 18:49 ` Johann Baudy
2008-11-18 19:10 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-18 19:46 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-07 17:28 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-07 20:22 ` David Miller
2008-10-31 20:28 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-04 22:33 ` Johann Baudy
2008-11-05 1:50 ` Lovich, Vitali
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-12 13:19 Johann Baudy
2008-11-05 15:16 Johann Baudy
2008-11-05 17:49 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-11-05 10:55 Johann Baudy
2008-11-05 11:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-11-05 17:32 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-10-30 13:00 Johann Baudy
2008-10-30 18:21 ` Lovich, Vitali
2008-10-27 9:33 Johann Baudy
2008-10-28 22:44 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081112181134.GA5396@ioremap.net \
--to=zbr@ioremap.net \
--cc=johaahn@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vlovich@qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.