From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/fsl_qe_udc: Report disconnect before unbinding
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:59:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081112195916.GA31938@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0811121435310.16854-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 02:38:02PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> > Gadgets disable endpoints in their disconnect callbacks, so
> > we must call disconnect before unbinding. This also fixes
> > muram memory leak, since we free muram in the qe_ep_disable().
>
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_qe_udc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_qe_udc.c
> > @@ -2382,6 +2382,9 @@ int usb_gadget_unregister_driver(struct usb_gadget_driver *driver)
> > nuke(loop_ep, -ESHUTDOWN);
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&udc_controller->lock, flags);
> >
> > + /* report disconnect; the driver is already quiesced */
> > + driver->disconnect(&udc_controller->gadget);
> > +
> > /* unbind gadget and unhook driver. */
> > driver->unbind(&udc_controller->gadget);
> > udc_controller->gadget.dev.driver = NULL;
>
> Wouldn't it be better to do this before nuking the existing requests?
> The comment is wrong; the gadget driver is _not_ quiesced at this
> point. In fact the disconnect call is what quiesces the driver!
composite_unbind() says:
/* composite_disconnect() must already have been called
* by the underlying peripheral controller driver!
* so there's no i/o concurrency that could affect the
* state protected by cdev->lock.
*/
Which I read as "at disconnect time the controller should
already be disabled, no further i/o can happen". Which means
that we should nuke all pending requests and stop the
controller.
In this comment:
"/* report disconnect; the driver is already quiesced */"
"the driver" means "the udc driver", not the gadget driver.
FWIW, the PXA27x UDC controller also stops all activity and
completely disables the controller before calling the
disconnect().
> And wouldn't it be better to _skip_ doing this if the gadget wasn't
> connected before?
Composite framework handles this. If there were no connections,
then the disconnect() is a nop (except the spin lock/unlock pair).
I'm not sure how the controller driver could tell if there
was a connection or not: it doesn't operate these terms.
What the udc controller knows is: how to report bus reset
and how to receive or transmit the data...
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-12 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-12 18:56 [PATCH] usb/fsl_qe_udc: Report disconnect before unbinding Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-12 19:38 ` Alan Stern
2008-11-12 19:59 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2008-11-12 20:12 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-12 20:20 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-12 21:12 ` Alan Stern
2008-11-13 11:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-18 1:01 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081112195916.GA31938@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=leoli@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.