From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <holtmann@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Abhijeet Kolekar <abhijeet.kolekar@intel.com>,
Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 2.6.28] iwlwifi : Fix channel scanning/association in 5Ghz band
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:29:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081112212900.GI2411@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081106134950.GB14184@tuxdriver.com>
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 08:49:50AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 11:17:22PM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>
> >> This patch is related to bug 11870 at bugzilla.kernel.org. With
> >> correct regulatory information the number of channels to scan
> >> will be correct and not zero as seen in that bug.
> >>
> >> This patch eliminates the need for wireless to be compiled with
> >> CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY to get correct regulatory behavior with
> >> iwlwifi.
> >
> > so this is still for 2.6.28, but for 2.6.29 and wireless-testing the API
> > changed and we need a separate or different patch.
> >
> > John, Dave what is your take on pushing this to Linus this late in the
> > merge window? I personally think we should do that. And if not, then
> > change the Intel wireless Kconfig to select
> > CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY by default at least.
>
> CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY is already 'default y' now. I don't
> really see why iwlwifi should _require_ that if someone decides to
> choose a non-default configuration.
In case this was unclear, I'm dropping these patches for 2.6.28.
The original post said different patches are needed for -next anyway.
John
--
John W. Linville Linux should be at the core
linville@tuxdriver.com of your literate lifestyle.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-12 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-05 19:14 [PATCH 1/2 2.6.28] iwlwifi : Fix channel scanning/association in 5Ghz band Reinette Chatre
2008-11-05 19:14 ` [PATCH 2/2 2.6.28] iwl3945 " Reinette Chatre
2008-11-05 22:17 ` [PATCH 1/2 2.6.28] iwlwifi " Marcel Holtmann
2008-11-05 22:41 ` reinette chatre
2008-11-06 1:07 ` Zhu Yi
2008-11-06 13:49 ` John W. Linville
2008-11-06 14:37 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-06 14:40 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-06 14:47 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-11-06 14:51 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-06 14:54 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-11-06 14:58 ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-06 15:08 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-11-12 21:29 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2008-11-12 21:45 ` reinette chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081112212900.GI2411@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=abhijeet.kolekar@intel.com \
--cc=holtmann@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.