From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1L0uDP-0004ik-Jp for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:39:44 +0000 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:39:38 +0100 From: Bernhard Walle Subject: Re: [PATCH] makedumpfile: Claim to support 2.6.27 Message-ID: <20081114093938.5cfcb2bf@hale.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <491CDDCE.2060307@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp> References: <109842e145d381000c4c.1226482968@hale.suse.de> <491BEE34.6070501@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp> <20081113121506.3a3b72b1@hale.suse.de> <491CDDCE.2060307@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Ken'ichi Ohmichi Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org Hi Ken'ichi, * Ken'ichi Ohmichi [2008-11-14 11:09]: > Bernhard Walle wrote: > > * Ken'ichi Ohmichi [2008-11-13 18:07]: > >> Bernhard Walle wrote: > >>> According to the changelog and my tests, 2.6.27 kernel is supported. Express > >>> that in the LATEST_VERSION check. > >> Thank your for your tests and your patch. > >> I also tested makedumpfile on linux-2.6.27 of both i386 and x86_64, > >> but I have not tested on ia64 yet. > >> So I want to know the CPU architecture of your machine to fill the > >> supporting table of makedumpfile's "README" file. > > > > I tested on ia64 in that case. > > Is your ia64 kernel discontigmem, or sparsemem ? CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM_MANUAL=y CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM=y Regards, Bernhard -- Bernhard Walle, SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Architecture Development _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec