From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/16 v6] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:30:29 -0800
Message-ID: <20081114193029.GA24902@kroah.com>
References: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F07552F2E8F06@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com> <9832F13BD22FB94A829F798DA4A82805018C18EE41@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F07552F2E8F20@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com> <491D2F23.1080005@intel.com> <20081114174029.GH22980@kroah.com> <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F07552F33C5F8@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com> <20081114183914.GA23801@kroah.com> <273D38FBE7C6FE46A1689FCD014A0B8B235006BF@azsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@intel.com>,
	"Zhao, Yu" <yu.zhao@intel.com>,
	"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Barnes, Jesse" <jesse.barnes@intel.com>,
	"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	"Yu, Wilfred" <wilfred.yu@intel.com>,
	"Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@intel.com>, "Li, Susie" <susie.li@intel.com>
To: "Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@intel.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:47607 "EHLO coco.kroah.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751854AbYKNUDF (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:03:05 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <273D38FBE7C6FE46A1689FCD014A0B8B235006BF@azsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:49:52AM -0700, Ronciak, John wrote:
> We have been waiting for the kernel IOV work to be in place upstream
> completely before we submitted the drivers.  Jeff Garzik won't take
> driver changes that have no user.  So as the kernel work completes,
> we'll submit the driver(s).
> 
> We have been talking about putting out the changes as RFC.  If that
> make sense we can do that.

That would make sense, as I had to ask multiple times if a driver was
actually using the IOV code that we could review to see if the api was
sane for it.

good luck,

greg k-h