From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2/21] Add blk_q_mask Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:19:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20081116221959.GC6703@one.firstfloor.org> References: <200811161211.212948789@firstfloor.org> <20081115231102.54DF53E661A@basil.firstfloor.org> <1226845288.3556.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:56665 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754471AbYKPWKX (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:10:23 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1226845288.3556.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Andi Kleen , axboe@kernel.dk, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > I'm confused by this signoff chain. You're supposed to give signoffs That is because I started writing this patchkit at SUSE, then worked a bit while I was just on my own (firstfloor) and now finally did some minor changes at Intel. The bulk of the work was all done under the SUSE banner, so if it's a problem I can remove the others, but I thought adding uptodate ones wouldn't hurt. > from each of the entities whose hands the patch passed through ... > unless you've taken to emailing your own patches to yourself, this > doesn't look right ... > > Could you just pick one? If it's about credit, then the reporting stats > go by Author. All three signoffs will do is inflate your rank in the That wasn't my intention. I'll remove the two newer ones in the next batch. -Andi