From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Petr Baudis" <pasky@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: fixes to gitweb feature check code
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:48:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811171148.03649.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vskpqzms5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
>> Dnia poniedziałek 17. listopada 2008 07:10, Giuseppe Bilotta napisał:
>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>>> First, you forgot the signoff, but you have addressed that already.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Second, I thought at first that it would be good for the patch to also
>>>> simplify %feature hash, using "'default' => 1" instead of current bit
>>>> convoluted "'default' => [1]", at the cost of bit more code for
>>>> defensive programming. But now I think that if it is to be done,
>>>> it should be put as separate patch.
>>>
>>> Is this an ACK? 8-D
>>
>> I'm sorry. Yes, it is.
>
> Are you sure, even with those unnecessary changes from list context
> assignments to scalar ones?
Well, on one hand this change is not _necessary_, as it would work
without it. On the other hand it feels like cleanup (like e.g. using
tabs to indent but spaces to align, or word-wrapping too long lines).
So I think I'll pass the ball to you... your call ;-)
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-17 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-15 14:26 [PATCH] gitweb: fixes to gitweb feature check code Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-11-16 15:30 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-11-16 21:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-16 21:57 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-11-17 1:02 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-17 6:10 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-11-17 9:28 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-17 10:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-17 10:48 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
[not found] <Message-ID: <cb7bb73a0811291731g7f8770f7p89e924c00d2ab004@mail.gmail.com>
2008-11-30 1:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] gitweb: make gitweb_check_feature a boolean wrapper Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-11-30 1:34 ` [PATCH] gitweb: fixes to gitweb feature check code Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-02 1:53 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-02 21:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-03 1:21 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811171148.03649.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.