All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@hp.com>,
	mingo@elte.hu, adobriyan@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regression introduced by - timers: fix itimer/many thread hang
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:36:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081117143623.GA4658@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081114164155.GA7738@redhat.com>

On 11/14, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Currently I am trying to find the ugly, but simple fixes for 2.6.28.
>
> account_group_user_time(), run_posix_cpu_timers() are simpler to
> fix. Again, I need to actually read the code, but afaics we can
> rely on the fact that the task is current, so we can change the
> code
>
> 	-	if (!->signal)
> 	+	if (->exit_state)
> 			return;

Yes, unless I missed something again, this should work. I'll send
the (simple) patches soon, but I have no idea how to test them.


However, I'm afraid there is another problem. On 32 bit cpus we can't
read "u64 sum_exec_runtime" atomically, and so thread_group_cputime()
can "overestimate" ->sum_exec_runtime by (up to) UINT_MAX if it races
with the thread which updates its per_cpu_ptr(.totals). This for example
means that check_process_timers() can fire the CPUCLOCK_SCHED timers
before time.

No?

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-17 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1224694989.8431.23.camel@oberon>
     [not found] ` <1225132746.14792.13.camel@bobble.smo.corp.google.com>
     [not found]   ` <1225219114.24204.37.camel@oberon>
2008-11-06  1:58     ` regression introduced by - timers: fix itimer/many thread hang Frank Mayhar
2008-11-06 11:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 15:03         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-06 15:08           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 16:08             ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-06 23:52             ` Frank Mayhar
2008-11-07  8:35               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-07 10:29               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-07 18:10                 ` Frank Mayhar
2008-11-07 20:26                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-10 14:38                     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-10 14:42                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-10 15:41                         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-10 18:00                         ` Frank Mayhar
2008-11-14  2:42                           ` Roland McGrath
2008-11-14 16:41                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-11-17 14:36                               ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2008-11-17 18:16                                 ` Roland McGrath
2008-11-17 22:18                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-11-17 21:49                                     ` Roland McGrath
2008-11-11  0:20                         ` Ingo Oeser
2008-11-11 13:58                           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-21 18:42                 ` Petr Tesarik
2008-11-21 19:26                   ` Frank Mayhar
2008-11-23 14:24                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-24  8:46                     ` Petr Tesarik
2008-11-24  9:33                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-24 12:32                         ` Petr Tesarik
2008-11-24 12:59                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-24 16:06                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 16:31         ` [PATCH] revert: " Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 21:44           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06 21:53             ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-07 10:19               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-13 16:00           ` Doug Chapman
2008-11-13 16:08             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-14 14:10               ` Doug Chapman
     [not found] <20081105191211.c0316b94.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2008-11-06 12:59 ` regression introduced by - " Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081117143623.GA4658@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=doug.chapman@hp.com \
    --cc=fmayhar@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.