From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:06:47 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/2] k8temp warn about errata Message-Id: <20081118100647.00be2a4b@hyperion.delvare> List-Id: References: <48E3F505.40401@assembler.cz> In-Reply-To: <48E3F505.40401@assembler.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi Andreas, On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:55:29 +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote: > your git tree is at git://jdelvare.pck.nerim.net/jdelvare-2.6, correct? > At least that's what you have used in your pull requests. No this is incorrect. This git tree is a temporary thing I use to let Linus pull my patches, but the actual work is done in a quilt tree at: http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/linux-2.6/jdelvare-hwmon/ That being said, please keep in mind that this is as unofficial as you can get, given that I am not the maintainer of the hwmon subsystem. > Did you apply Rudolf's patch to this git tree? > > I just want to know against which tree I need to create patches when adapting > k8temp. For now I applied: http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/linux-2.6/jdelvare-hwmon/hwmon-k8temp-01-warn-about-errata.patch But everyone involved seems to agree that it isn't sufficient and we should prevent the driver from binding to broken devices if possible, using either a revision-based blacklist, or a temperature value-based heuristic. I didn't yet have the time to work on this though, nor did anyone else apparently. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors