From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATA timeouts on old thinkpad
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:31:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081121083133.GA23336@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081121003723.03bcef7e@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:37:23AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:25:21 +0000
> Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Last weekend I upgraded my old Thinkpad from Fedora Core 2 to F9
> > (a 2.6.9 kernel to a 2.6.25 kernel). The old 2.6.9 kernel was
> > using the IDE drivers, and there have been no issues with IDE on
> > this hardware until this upgrade.
>
> Can you double the timeouts for block I/O commands. The libata core uses
> 30 second timeouts for a lot of stuff and some PATA drives really do want
> 60.
>
> Other than that there really isn't any difference in the settings the two
> drivers use as they are all written up exactly in the Intel docs.
I'm not sure that lengthening the timeout is going to help - with
the older IDE drivers, I've never had the laptop wait on disk IO
for longer than about 5 seconds even when the disk has been spun
down.
Is this timeout parameter is only changeable by rebuilding the kernel?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-21 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-21 0:25 PATA timeouts on old thinkpad Russell King
2008-11-21 0:37 ` Alan Cox
2008-11-21 8:31 ` Russell King [this message]
2008-11-24 12:48 ` Russell King
2009-06-10 23:36 ` Russell King
2009-06-11 11:05 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-11 11:29 ` Russell King
2009-06-11 11:40 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081121083133.GA23336@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.