Re: [RFC] i2c-omap: Don't wait needlessly

[Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>]

* Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@nokia.com> [081027 09:22]:
> Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>> I would rather, if there is no need for such a long delay like
>> OMAP_I2C_TIMEOUT, remove that time_after and msleep(1) stuff and
>> just loop few iterations with udelay(1). Zero thinked & tested diff
>> attached.
>
> I just though of allowing the reset to take longer as I have no idea how  
> long it could take, let alone other versions of OMAP.
>
>> I would say that ndelay(1) just doesn't look relevant to < 1 GHz
>> cpus :-)
>
> Good point. On ARM ndelay(1) seems to be equal to udelay(1) at the moment.
>
> I actually just removed the ndelay(1) and again, "delay" won't get past  
> 1 if I print it after the loop.
>
> It'd be nice to know how it works on other OMAP versions before making  
> such changes. :-)

Let me know if you come up with a refreshed patch for this, ignoring
for now.

Tony