Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-omap: Fix BUFSTAT_REG reading

[Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>]

* David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> [081119 09:34]:
> On Wednesday 19 November 2008, Eero Nurkkala wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 11:16 -0800, ext David Brownell wrote:
> 
> > > But if the issue is that the 2430 version of the FIFO
> > > support works differently, please say so in the patch
> > > commend and code...
> >
> > I checked against 2420, and there was no such register
> > avaiable at all.  (no 2430 TRM access)
> 
> That code path couldn't be triggered on 2420; just 2430,
> which has the FIFO (as evidently needed for highspeed I2C).
> 
> My default assumption would be that 2430 works just like
> OMAP3 here, but obviously someone should check the 2430
> TRM to see its I2C BUFSTAT_REG really works differently.

Yes, they seem to be the same for 2430 and 34xx. Eero, can you please
update it to use the dev->rev instead? I just pushed Paul's earlier
patches for the dev->rev.

Tony