From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: ?ric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trenn@suse.de, rpurdie@rpsys.net,
hmh@hmh.eng.br
Subject: Re: HP accelerometer: split chip handling from HP ACPI interface
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:21:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081122122149.GA1794@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <492757A8.6010509@tremplin-utc.net>
On Sat 2008-11-22 01:51:52, ?ric Piel wrote:
> Éric Piel schreef:
> > Andrew Morton schreef:
> >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:21:21 +0100
> >> Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This patch splits handling between chip-specific lis3lv02d and HP/ACPI
> >>> specific hp_accel.c.
> >> umm, so? What reason does anyone have for applying it?
> > Here is the log I have for the (old version) of pavel's patch:
> >
> > The sensor can be accessed via various buses. In particular, SPI, I?C
> > and, on HP laptops, via a specific ACPI API (the only one currently
> > supported). Separate this latest platform from the core of the sensor
> > driver to allow support for the other bus type. The second, and more
> > direct goal is actually to be able to merge this part with the
> > hp-disk-leds driver, which has the same ACPI PNP number.
> >
> >
> > I'll try to follow with a patch doing the merge of the hp-disk-leds
> > driver, so that everything makes sense...
>
> Actually, I mistook, Pavel also included some led stuff in this patch.
> That doesn't look right, especially as the led driver is not
>removed!
I was simply planning to remove the LED stuff in the followup patch. I
guess I should have mentioned that in the changelog...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-22 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-21 21:21 HP accelerometer: split chip handling from HP ACPI interface Pavel Machek
2008-11-22 0:00 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-22 0:25 ` Éric Piel
2008-11-22 0:51 ` Éric Piel
2008-11-22 0:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] LIS3LV02D: separate the core from HP ACPI API Éric Piel
2008-11-22 12:35 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-22 14:28 ` Éric Piel
2008-11-22 0:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] LIS3LV02D: Merge with leds-hp-disk Éric Piel
2008-11-22 12:21 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-11-22 0:58 ` HP accelerometer: split chip handling from HP ACPI interface Andrew Morton
2008-11-28 8:22 ` HP accelerometer: free fall detection working, testers wanted Pavel Machek
2008-11-28 10:02 ` Éric Piel
2008-11-28 10:44 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-30 22:16 ` Éric Piel
2008-12-01 11:55 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-12-01 12:03 ` Éric Piel
2009-01-09 10:13 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081122122149.GA1794@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.