All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	sct@redhat.com, adilger@sun.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 2/3 BUG,RFC] ext3: release block-device-mapping buffer_heads which have the filesystem private data for avoiding oom-killer
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:51:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081124055133.GB20928@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081120093450.c87b39ef.toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>

Hi Toshijuki,

My apologizes for not getting back to you sooner.  My travel schedule
has been a little crazy lately, including being in Japan last week
speaking at the Japan Linux Symposium.

Your patch series looks good, but I have one comment, for the ext3 and
ext4 patches:

> +	if (journal != NULL)
> +		return journal_try_to_free_buffers(journal, page, wait);
> +	else
> +		return try_to_free_buffers(page);

According to the documentation for journal_try_to_free_buffers():

 * This function returns non-zero if we wish try_to_free_buffers()
 * to be called. We do this if the page is releasable by try_to_free_buffers().
 * We also do it if the page has locked or dirty buffers and the caller wants
 * us to perform sync or async writeout.

So I think the last conditional in ext3_release_metadata() needs to be
changed to be like this:

+	if ((journal != NULL) && 
+	    (journal_try_to_free_buffers(journal, page, wait) == 0))
+		return 0;
+	return try_to_free_buffers(page);

A similar change should be made in the ext4 version of the patch.
Does that sound OK to you?

Regards,

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-24  5:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-20  0:34 [RESEND][PATCH 2/3 BUG,RFC] ext3: release block-device-mapping buffer_heads which have the filesystem private data for avoiding oom-killer Toshiyuki Okajima
2008-11-24  5:51 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-11-25  1:00   ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2008-11-25  4:09     ` Toshiyuki Okajima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081124055133.GB20928@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.