From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:14:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20081125071436.GA9660@elte.hu> References: <20081125142105.2b6d464a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1227584931.7622.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081125151345.3f0ed493.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1227587493.7622.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081125160935.2bd3dcb2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1227591856.7622.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081125175708.d28d08cd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:60085 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750932AbYKYHOy (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:14:54 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081125175708.d28d08cd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:44:16 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > Yep, it was the wrong constraint used in the asm. Googling around, I > > found a similar bug listed in gcc, which was not a bug. > > Amazing what we trip over :-( > > > Patch has been sent to fix this. > > Can you put that patch in your tree as well, or will it reach > linux-next quickly enough anyway? i've applied the assembly constraint fix to the x86 tree and i've integrated a new version of auto-x86-next which includes the fix, and pushed it out. Thanks, Ingo