From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hugh@veritas.com, holt@sgi.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au,
riel@redhat.com
Subject: + mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:15:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811252215.mAPMFl1C005829@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
mm: try_to_free_swap replaces remove_exclusive_swap_page
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: mm: try_to_free_swap replaces remove_exclusive_swap_page
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
remove_exclusive_swap_page(): its problem is in living up to its name.
It doesn't matter if someone else has a reference to the page (raised
page_count); it doesn't matter if the page is mapped into userspace
(raised page_mapcount - though that hints it may be worth keeping the
swap): all that matters is that there be no more references to the swap
(and no writeback in progress).
swapoff (try_to_unuse) has been removing pages from swapcache for years,
with no concern for page count or page mapcount, and we used to have a
comment in lookup_swap_cache() recognizing that: if you go for a page of
swapcache, you'll get the right page, but it could have been removed from
swapcache by the time you get page lock.
So, give up asking for exclusivity: get rid of
remove_exclusive_swap_page(), and remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref() and
remove_exclusive_swap_page_count() which were spawned for the recent LRU
work: replace them by the simpler try_to_free_swap() which just checks
page_swapcount().
Similarly, remove the page_count limitation from free_swap_and_count(),
but assume that it's worth holding on to the swap if page is mapped and
swap nowhere near full. Add a vm_swap_full() test in free_swap_cache()?
It would be consistent, but I think we probably have enough for now.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/swap.h | 10 +----
mm/memory.c | 2 -
mm/page_io.c | 2 -
mm/swap.c | 3 -
mm/swap_state.c | 8 ++--
mm/swapfile.c | 70 +++++++----------------------------------
mm/vmscan.c | 2 -
7 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/swap.h~mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page include/linux/swap.h
--- a/include/linux/swap.h~mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page
+++ a/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -308,8 +308,7 @@ extern sector_t map_swap_page(struct swa
extern sector_t swapdev_block(int, pgoff_t);
extern struct swap_info_struct *get_swap_info_struct(unsigned);
extern int reuse_swap_page(struct page *);
-extern int remove_exclusive_swap_page(struct page *);
-extern int remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref(struct page *);
+extern int try_to_free_swap(struct page *);
struct backing_dev_info;
/* linux/mm/thrash.c */
@@ -391,12 +390,7 @@ static inline void delete_from_swap_cach
#define reuse_swap_page(page) (page_mapcount(page) == 1)
-static inline int remove_exclusive_swap_page(struct page *p)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline int remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref(struct page *page)
+static inline int try_to_free_swap(struct page *page)
{
return 0;
}
diff -puN mm/memory.c~mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page mm/memory.c
--- a/mm/memory.c~mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page
+++ a/mm/memory.c
@@ -2374,7 +2374,7 @@ static int do_swap_page(struct mm_struct
swap_free(entry);
if (vm_swap_full() || (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) || PageMlocked(page))
- remove_exclusive_swap_page(page);
+ try_to_free_swap(page);
unlock_page(page);
if (write_access) {
diff -puN mm/page_io.c~mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page mm/page_io.c
--- a/mm/page_io.c~mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page
+++ a/mm/page_io.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ int swap_writepage(struct page *page, st
struct bio *bio;
int ret = 0, rw = WRITE;
- if (remove_exclusive_swap_page(page)) {
+ if (try_to_free_swap(page)) {
unlock_page(page);
goto out;
}
diff -puN mm/swap.c~mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page mm/swap.c
--- a/mm/swap.c~mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page
+++ a/mm/swap.c
@@ -467,8 +467,7 @@ void pagevec_swap_free(struct pagevec *p
struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
if (PageSwapCache(page) && trylock_page(page)) {
- if (PageSwapCache(page))
- remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref(page);
+ try_to_free_swap(page);
unlock_page(page);
}
}
diff -puN mm/swap_state.c~mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page mm/swap_state.c
--- a/mm/swap_state.c~mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page
+++ a/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -195,14 +195,14 @@ void delete_from_swap_cache(struct page
* If we are the only user, then try to free up the swap cache.
*
* Its ok to check for PageSwapCache without the page lock
- * here because we are going to recheck again inside
- * exclusive_swap_page() _with_ the lock.
+ * here because we are going to recheck again inside
+ * try_to_free_swap() _with_ the lock.
* - Marcelo
*/
static inline void free_swap_cache(struct page *page)
{
- if (PageSwapCache(page) && trylock_page(page)) {
- remove_exclusive_swap_page(page);
+ if (PageSwapCache(page) && !page_mapped(page) && trylock_page(page)) {
+ try_to_free_swap(page);
unlock_page(page);
}
}
diff -puN mm/swapfile.c~mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page mm/swapfile.c
--- a/mm/swapfile.c~mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page
+++ a/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -348,68 +348,23 @@ int reuse_swap_page(struct page *page)
}
/*
- * Work out if there are any other processes sharing this
- * swap cache page. Free it if you can. Return success.
+ * If swap is getting full, or if there are no more mappings of this page,
+ * then try_to_free_swap is called to free its swap space.
*/
-static int remove_exclusive_swap_page_count(struct page *page, int count)
+int try_to_free_swap(struct page *page)
{
- int retval;
- struct swap_info_struct * p;
- swp_entry_t entry;
-
VM_BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
if (!PageSwapCache(page))
return 0;
if (PageWriteback(page))
return 0;
- if (page_count(page) != count) /* us + cache + ptes */
- return 0;
-
- entry.val = page_private(page);
- p = swap_info_get(entry);
- if (!p)
+ if (page_swapcount(page))
return 0;
- /* Is the only swap cache user the cache itself? */
- retval = 0;
- if (p->swap_map[swp_offset(entry)] == 1) {
- /* Recheck the page count with the swapcache lock held.. */
- spin_lock_irq(&swapper_space.tree_lock);
- if ((page_count(page) == count) && !PageWriteback(page)) {
- __delete_from_swap_cache(page);
- SetPageDirty(page);
- retval = 1;
- }
- spin_unlock_irq(&swapper_space.tree_lock);
- }
- spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
-
- if (retval) {
- swap_free(entry);
- page_cache_release(page);
- }
-
- return retval;
-}
-
-/*
- * Most of the time the page should have two references: one for the
- * process and one for the swap cache.
- */
-int remove_exclusive_swap_page(struct page *page)
-{
- return remove_exclusive_swap_page_count(page, 2);
-}
-
-/*
- * The pageout code holds an extra reference to the page. That raises
- * the reference count to test for to 2 for a page that is only in the
- * swap cache plus 1 for each process that maps the page.
- */
-int remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref(struct page *page)
-{
- return remove_exclusive_swap_page_count(page, 2 + page_mapcount(page));
+ delete_from_swap_cache(page);
+ SetPageDirty(page);
+ return 1;
}
/*
@@ -436,13 +391,12 @@ void free_swap_and_cache(swp_entry_t ent
spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
}
if (page) {
- int one_user;
-
- one_user = (page_count(page) == 2);
- /* Only cache user (+us), or swap space full? Free it! */
- /* Also recheck PageSwapCache after page is locked (above) */
+ /*
+ * Not mapped elsewhere, or swap space full? Free it!
+ * Also recheck PageSwapCache now page is locked (above).
+ */
if (PageSwapCache(page) && !PageWriteback(page) &&
- (one_user || vm_swap_full())) {
+ (!page_mapped(page) || vm_swap_full())) {
delete_from_swap_cache(page);
SetPageDirty(page);
}
diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page mm/vmscan.c
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ cull_mlocked:
activate_locked:
/* Not a candidate for swapping, so reclaim swap space. */
if (PageSwapCache(page) && vm_swap_full())
- remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref(page);
+ try_to_free_swap(page);
VM_BUG_ON(PageActive(page));
SetPageActive(page);
keep_locked:
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from hugh@veritas.com are
linux-next.patch
mm-dont-mark_page_accessed-in-shmem_fault.patch
mm-apply_to_range-call-pte-function-with-lazy-updates.patch
mm-remove-cgroup_mm_owner_callbacks.patch
mm-remove-aop_writepage_activate.patch
mm-remove-gfp_highuser_pagecache.patch
mm-add-setclearpageswapcache-stubs.patch
mm-replace-some-bug_ons-by-vm_bug_ons.patch
mm-add_active_or_unevictable-into-rmap.patch
mm-make-page_lock_anon_vma-static.patch
mm-further-cleanup-page_add_new_anon_rmap.patch
mm-gup-persist-for-write-permission.patch
mm-wp-lock-page-before-deciding-cow.patch
mm-reuse_swap_page-replaces-can_share_swap_page.patch
mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page.patch
mm-try_to_unuse-check-removing-right-swap.patch
mm-remove-try_to_munlock-from-vmscan.patch
mm-remove-gfp_mask-from-add_to_swap.patch
mm-add-add_to_swap-stub.patch
mm-optimize-get_scan_ratio-for-no-swap.patch
memcg-handle-swap-caches.patch
memcg-handle-swap-caches-build-fix.patch
memcg-swap-cgroup-for-remembering-usage.patch
memcg-memswap-controller-core.patch
memcg-memswap-controller-core-make-resize-limit-hold-mutex.patch
memcg-memswap-controller-core-swapcache-fixes.patch
prio_tree-debugging-patch.patch
reply other threads:[~2008-11-25 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811252215.mAPMFl1C005829@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.