From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the perfmon3 tree Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:16:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20081126071650.GE26036@elte.hu> References: <20081125210319.35b2d189.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081125102234.GA4281@elte.hu> <7c86c4470811250640v4417fa4fs196f0d0bea136a45@mail.gmail.com> <20081125153345.GA20733@elte.hu> <7c86c4470811250836k2f798c21pe4766a565a6231ab@mail.gmail.com> <20081125165118.GF22504@elte.hu> <20081126140032.72d86f17.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081126033318.GE8242@elte.hu> <18732.62831.286805.400379@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:33842 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750696AbYKZHRS (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:17:18 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18732.62831.286805.400379@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Paul Mackerras Cc: Stephen Rothwell , eranian@gmail.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Alexander van Heukelum , the arch/x86 maintainers , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton * Paul Mackerras wrote: > Ingo Molnar writes: > > > We know and knew about the existence of the perfmon patches, but they > > were always in the vague RFC category and never directly submitted or > > Cc:-ed to us. > > So at least now we have your attention. :) > > The best thing now might be for Stephane to do a patch set with the > perfmon3 core + powerpc bits. I'd be happy to take that through my > tree, and I really want to see perfmon3 get upstream. X86 can > follow whenever you can get some time to take a look at it. Sounds sensible. x86 doesnt always have to be the guinea pig for new kernel features :) Ingo