From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [206.46.252.44] (helo=vms044pub.verizon.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L5PRa-0003hC-Up for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:48:59 +0100 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([71.255.226.167]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KAY004V7ESCAAC4@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:45:49 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D55936B83B5; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:45:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:45:47 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko In-reply-to: To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20081126184547.GB27631@denix.org> MIME-version: 1.0 References: <200811261755.53197.mickey@vanille-media.de> <1227721214.19934.33.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> <48239d390811261012w26eb9a9fva6c7eacf4aff0a50@mail.gmail.com> <20081126182400.GA27631@denix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: preferred-provider at the image level a.k.a why is all this fso stuff in my non-fso image X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:49:01 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 07:33:29PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > On 26-11-08 19:24, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 09:12:34PM +0300, Sergey Lapin wrote: >>> I just need to mention we have same kind of problems with mplayer vs >>> mplayer-maemo recipe, >>> when you try to put e.g. mencoder into IMAGE_INSTALL, mplayer-maemo >>> recipe is used instead of mplayer one. >>> Also, which is weird, I was able to reproduce this lots of times on >>> one my setup even with build from scratch, >>> and was unable to do so with my another setup. >> >> Sorry for my naive question, but why can't it be specified with >> >> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_mplayer = "mplayer" > > That works at buildtime, opkg doesn't know about preferred_provider. Thanks, that makes sense. Sergey's email above made me believe he was having build issues though. -- Denys