From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nadim khemir Subject: Re: [RFC] Git Perl bindings, and OO interface Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:45:18 +0100 Message-ID: <200811301445.18969.nadim@khemir.net> References: <200811270258.50898.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Nov 30 14:45:39 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L6mcD-0004Fh-JD for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:45:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751444AbYK3NoU (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:44:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751394AbYK3NoU (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:44:20 -0500 Received: from mail1.perspektivbredband.net ([81.186.254.13]:36927 "EHLO mail1.perspektivbredband.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751362AbYK3NoT (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:44:19 -0500 Received: from khemir.net (h51bafc0a.c46-01-06.sta.perspektivbredband.net [81.186.252.10]) by mail1.perspektivbredband.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786C3940030 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:44:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from naquadim.khemir.lan (naquadim.khemir.lan [192.168.1.234]) by khemir.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B94812640A7 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:44:18 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 In-Reply-To: <200811270258.50898.jnareb@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-gr0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-gr0 (2008-06-10) on firewall Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thursday 27 November 2008 02.58.49 Jakub Narebski wrote: > ... > > 7. Git::Refs > > It is meant to represent references, mainly branches, and be filled > using git-for-each-ref... and for example used for ref markers. > > There are probably a few things I have forgot about... Thank you for writing the RFC, it's a very good start. I would like to see some strategy for libgit[2] in the RFC. What is your opinion about that? Nadim.