From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@volumehost.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "James Pickens" <jepicken@gmail.com>,
"Scott Chacon" <schacon@gmail.com>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modified the default git help message to be grouped by topic
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:33:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812021533.42114.bss03@volumehost.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <885649360812021211u3d547982i8e1c3070972363e8@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1254 bytes --]
On Tuesday 02 December 2008, "James Pickens" <jepicken@gmail.com> wrote
about 'Re: [PATCH] Modified the default git help message to be grouped by
topic':
>On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I sent a new patch that removes 'rm' and 'mv' and removes the
>> common-cmd.h build process. I did keep the 'status' command, since in
>> my personal experience people tend to like having that command.
>
>Even though 'rm' might not be used very often, I think it's an important
>enough command that it should not be removed from the 'basics' list.
>AFAIK, the only other way to delete a file is 'rm file' followed by 'git
>add -u' or 'git commit -a'. Imagine a git newbie trying to figure that
>out.
>
>I'm tempted to say the same thing about 'mv' as well. And FWIW, I use
>'status' a lot more than I use 'diff', so I would vote to keep 'status'
> in the list too.
x2 to all of both paragraphs, except that I'm not just "tempted"; I do say
that mv should be kept.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
bss03@volumehost.net ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-02 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-01 17:30 [PATCH] Modified the default git help message to be grouped by topic Scott Chacon
2008-12-01 18:32 ` Jeff King
2008-12-02 1:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-02 6:10 ` Scott Chacon
2008-12-02 20:11 ` James Pickens
2008-12-02 21:33 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [this message]
2008-12-02 22:55 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-12-02 23:30 ` Jeff King
2008-12-02 23:39 ` Scott Chacon
2008-12-03 0:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-03 0:37 ` Jeff King
2008-12-03 0:47 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200812021533.42114.bss03@volumehost.net \
--to=bss03@volumehost.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jepicken@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=schacon@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.