All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: __cpu_up vs. start_secondary race?
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:20:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081203052020.GG6829@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228279963.7356.238.camel@pasglop>

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 20:16 -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > Apart from barriers (or lack thereof), the fact that __cpu_up gives up
> > after a more-or-less arbitrary period seems... well, arbitrary.  If we
> > get to "Processor X is stuck" then something is seriously wrong:
> > there's either a kernel bug or a platform issue, and the CPU just
> > kicked is in an unknown state.  Polling indefinitely seems safer, no?
> > Especially since some hypervisors allow overcommitting processors and
> > memory, which can introduce latencies in unexpected places.
> 
> I'm pretty happy to keep the timeout :-) Proved useful in many cases
> where we actually fail to bring it up or crash it at bringup. From my
> experience, most of the time, the stuck CPU isn't getting in the way and
> it gets us a chance to move forward.

Fair enough -- thanks.

      reply	other threads:[~2008-12-03  5:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-01 21:30 __cpu_up vs. start_secondary race? Nathan Lynch
2008-12-01 22:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-12-03  2:16   ` Nathan Lynch
2008-12-03  4:14     ` Trent Piepho
2008-12-03  4:52     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-12-03  5:20       ` Nathan Lynch [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081203052020.GG6829@localdomain \
    --to=ntl@pobox.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.