From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:18:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] sensors-detect: testers wanted! Message-Id: <20081203201805.6b7e69a8@hyperion.delvare> List-Id: References: <20081203182216.5be504cf@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20081203182216.5be504cf@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks for testing and reporting. On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:25:10 -0500, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote: > Here is what I have with your version: > > Driver `it87': > * ISA bus, address 0xe80 > Chip `ITE IT8720F Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9) > > Driver `to-be-written': > * Chip `AMD K10 thermal sensors' (confidence: 9) > > > And here is what I had with the previous one: > > Driver `it87' (should be inserted): > Detects correctly: > * ISA bus, address 0xe80 > Chip `ITE IT8720 Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9) > > Driver `k8temp' (should be inserted): > Detects correctly: > * Chip `AMD K10 thermal sensors' (confidence: 9) > > > I'm not 100% sur why I had a K8 before and a K10 with this new > version. I remember that I have apply a patch in the kernel to handle > Phenom internal sensors, but since this is kernel related, I think it > should have no impact on the sensors-detect script. I will try to > install and compile a brand next 2.6.27.7 kernel and retest. You have a K10 (actually: family 10h) in both cases. What changed is the device->driver mapping. At some point we thought that family 10h support could be added to the k8temp driver, but now it seems that we will have a separate driver for the family 10h CPUs. So this change is expected. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors