From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu,
richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com
Subject: [RFC Patch 7/9] Modify signal handling code to refrain from re-enabling HW Breakpoints
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 00:44:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081204191407.GG20563@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081204190804.GA15134@in.ibm.com>
This patch disables re-enabling of Hardware Breakpoint registers through the
signal handling code. This is now during hw_breakpoint_handler().
Signed-off-by: K.Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c | 9 ---------
arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c | 9 ---------
2 files changed, 18 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.28-rc5-bkpt-latest/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.28-rc5-bkpt-latest.orig/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c
+++ linux-2.6.28-rc5-bkpt-latest/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c
@@ -622,15 +622,6 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *re
signr = get_signal_to_deliver(&info, &ka, regs, NULL);
if (signr > 0) {
- /*
- * Re-enable any watchpoints before delivering the
- * signal to user space. The processor register will
- * have been cleared if the watchpoint triggered
- * inside the kernel.
- */
- if (current->thread.debugreg7)
- set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg7, 7);
-
/* Whee! Actually deliver the signal. */
if (handle_signal(signr, &info, &ka, oldset, regs) == 0) {
/*
Index: linux-2.6.28-rc5-bkpt-latest/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.28-rc5-bkpt-latest.orig/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
+++ linux-2.6.28-rc5-bkpt-latest/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
@@ -422,15 +422,6 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *re
signr = get_signal_to_deliver(&info, &ka, regs, NULL);
if (signr > 0) {
- /*
- * Re-enable any watchpoints before delivering the
- * signal to user space. The processor register will
- * have been cleared if the watchpoint triggered
- * inside the kernel.
- */
- if (current->thread.debugreg7)
- set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg7, 7);
-
/* Whee! Actually deliver the signal. */
if (handle_signal(signr, &info, &ka, oldset, regs) == 0) {
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-04 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-04 19:08 [RFC Patch 0/9] Hardware Breakpoint interfaces - v2 K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:11 ` [RFC Patch 1/9] Introducing generic hardware breakpoint handler interfaces K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:38 ` David Daney
2008-12-17 3:47 ` K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:11 ` [RFC Patch 2/9] x86 architecture implementation of Hardware Breakpoint interfaces K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:12 ` [RFC Patch 3/9] Modifying generic debug exception to use virtual debug registers K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:13 ` [RFC Patch 4/9] Modify kprobe exception handler to recognise single-stepping by HW Breakpoint handler K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:13 ` [RFC Patch 5/9] Use wrapper routines around debug registers in processor related functions K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:13 ` [RFC Patch 6/9] Use virtual debug registers in process/thread handling code K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:14 ` K.Prasad [this message]
2008-12-04 19:16 ` [RFC Patch 8/9] Modify Ptrace routines to access breakpoint registers K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:17 ` [RFC Patch 9/9] Cleanup HW Breakpoint registers before kexec K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:17 ` [RFC Patch 0/9] Hardware Breakpoint interfaces - v2 K.Prasad
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-08 19:20 K.Prasad
2008-10-08 19:26 ` [RFC Patch 7/9] Modify signal handling code to refrain from re-enabling HW Breakpoints K.Prasad
2008-10-07 11:38 [RFC Patch 0/9] Hardware Breakpoint interfaces K.Prasad
2008-10-07 11:45 ` [RFC Patch 7/9] Modify signal handling code to refrain from re-enabling HW Breakpoints K.Prasad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081204191407.GG20563@in.ibm.com \
--to=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.