From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc7 acpi error messages Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:02:55 +0000 Message-ID: <20081204230255.GA14130@srcf.ucam.org> References: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308580DD52E96@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <20081203230332.GA26733@srcf.ucam.org> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308580DD52F0F@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <20081203233557.GA27180@srcf.ucam.org> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308580DD53280@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308580DD53927@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:48488 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752412AbYLDXDE (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:03:04 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308580DD53927@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Moore, Robert" Cc: "Koornstra, Reinoud" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "Brown, Len" , "Lin, Ming M" , "Zhao, Yakui" On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 02:49:52PM -0800, Moore, Robert wrote: > Well, lo and behold! With a newer version of acpidump, we do get both the RSDT and XSDT and there are indeed two different FADTs. > > Acpidump should post a version number to prevent this kind of thrash in the future. > > The FADT within the RSDT seems much more reasonable. It is a short (rev 1) FADT with no 64-bit register addresses to cause issues. I still suspect the GPE0 block length (0x10) however. Huh. Right, so either Windows ignores the length or uses the length (but not the address) from the X block. The plot thickens. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org