From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH next] staging-p80211: Kill directly reference of c Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:06:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20081205.190603.130855663.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4939E35D.4010102@cn.fujitsu.com> <20081205.183015.127189402.davem@davemloft.net> <20081206024123.GB31523@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: gregkh@suse.de Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:34241 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751907AbYLFDGC (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2008 22:06:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081206024123.GB31523@suse.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Greg KH Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:41:23 -0800 > On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 06:30:15PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > From: Wang Chen > > Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:28:45 +0800 > > > > > Greg KH said the following on 2008-12-5 23:44: > > > > thanks for the patch, I'll queue it up, > > > > > > I'm doing this "kill netdev->priv" work on Dave's net-next tree now. > > > So, will it be better to let Dave apply this to his net-next instead > > > you apply it? > > > Just suggestion :) > > > > Yes, I would prefer it be done this way so I can do the final > > kill of the netdev->priv member without having to wait for > > a dependency on the staging tree :) > > Feel free to take it yourself, I have no objection to anyone else > taking drivers/staging/ patches if they want to. You're the first one > to be so brave :) > > You can add a: > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > to the patch. Great, I'll do that, thanks Greg!